LJUL vs. JAJL
LJUL (Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July) and JAJL (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LJUL returned 5.58% vs 7.99% for JAJL. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
LJUL vs. JAJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LJUL achieves a 1.84% return, which is significantly lower than JAJL's 2.53% return.
LJUL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 1.84%
- 6M
- 2.37%
- 1Y
- 5.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JAJL
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 2.53%
- 6M
- 2.95%
- 1Y
- 7.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LJUL vs. JAJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LJUL Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July | 1.84% | 5.91% | 3.27% |
JAJL Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul | 2.53% | 6.56% | 4.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between LJUL and JAJL is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2024 | 0.58 |
The correlation between LJUL and JAJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LJUL vs. JAJL — Risk / Return Rank
LJUL
JAJL
LJUL vs. JAJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July (LJUL) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul (JAJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LJUL | JAJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.54 | 3.46 | +0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.79 | 5.81 | -0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.88 | 1.85 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.68 | 8.07 | +2.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 53.99 | 39.79 | +14.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LJUL | JAJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.54 | 3.46 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.79 | 2.69 | -0.90 |
Drawdowns
LJUL vs. JAJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LJUL drawdown since its inception was -3.21%, which is greater than JAJL's maximum drawdown of -2.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LJUL and JAJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LJUL | JAJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.21% | -2.16% | -1.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.52% | -1.01% | +0.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.03% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.12% | -0.28% | +0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.10% | 0.20% | -0.10% |
Volatility
LJUL vs. JAJL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July (LJUL) is 0.22%, while Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul (JAJL) has a volatility of 0.41%. This indicates that LJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JAJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LJUL | JAJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.22% | 0.41% | -0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.06% | 1.39% | -0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58% | 2.32% | -0.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.25% | 2.67% | +0.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.25% | 2.67% | +0.58% |
LJUL vs. JAJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both LJUL and JAJL have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
LJUL vs. JAJL - Dividend Comparison
LJUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.23%, while JAJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
JAJL Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LJUL Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July | 5.23% | 5.36% | 2.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LJUL and JAJL have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JAJL has higher volatility (0.41%) compared to LJUL (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LJUL dropped -3.21% vs JAJL's -2.16%.
On 1-year performance, JAJL leads with 7.99% vs 5.58% for LJUL. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, LJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, JAJL has performed better with a 7.99% return vs 5.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LJUL and JAJL have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
LJUL has the higher dividend yield at 5.23%, compared with 0.00% for JAJL.
LJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.54 vs 3.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LJUL and JAJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer