PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LJUL vs. JAJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LJUL vs. JAJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July (LJUL) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul (JAJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LJUL achieves a 1.84% return, which is significantly lower than JAJL's 2.53% return.


LJUL

1D
0.00%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.84%
6M
2.37%
1Y
5.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JAJL

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.62%
YTD
2.53%
6M
2.95%
1Y
7.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LJUL vs. JAJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LJUL and JAJL is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2024

0.58

The correlation between LJUL and JAJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LJUL vs. JAJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LJUL
LJUL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
LJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
LJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
LJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

JAJL
JAJL Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
JAJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAJL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
JAJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAJL Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LJUL vs. JAJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July (LJUL) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul (JAJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LJULJAJLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.54

3.46

+0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.79

5.81

-0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.88

1.85

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

10.68

8.07

+2.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

53.99

39.79

+14.19

LJUL vs. JAJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LJUL Sharpe Ratio is 3.54, which is comparable to the JAJL Sharpe Ratio of 3.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LJUL and JAJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LJULJAJLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.54

3.46

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.79

2.69

-0.90

Drawdowns

LJUL vs. JAJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LJUL drawdown since its inception was -3.21%, which is greater than JAJL's maximum drawdown of -2.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LJUL and JAJL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LJULJAJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

-2.16%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.52%

-1.01%

+0.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.03%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.12%

-0.28%

+0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.10%

0.20%

-0.10%

Volatility

LJUL vs. JAJL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July (LJUL) is 0.22%, while Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul (JAJL) has a volatility of 0.41%. This indicates that LJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JAJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LJULJAJLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.22%

0.41%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.06%

1.39%

-0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58%

2.32%

-0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.25%

2.67%

+0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.25%

2.67%

+0.58%

LJUL vs. JAJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LJUL and JAJL have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

LJUL vs. JAJL - Dividend Comparison

LJUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.23%, while JAJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


LJUL and JAJL have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JAJL has higher volatility (0.41%) compared to LJUL (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LJUL dropped -3.21% vs JAJL's -2.16%.

On 1-year performance, JAJL leads with 7.99% vs 5.58% for LJUL. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, LJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JAJL has performed better with a 7.99% return vs 5.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LJUL and JAJL have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

LJUL has the higher dividend yield at 5.23%, compared with 0.00% for JAJL.

LJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.54 vs 3.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LJUL and JAJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer