JULB vs. DDTN
JULB (Aptus July Buffer ETF) and DDTN (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - November) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JULB charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for DDTN.
Performance
JULB vs. DDTN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JULB achieves a 6.38% return, which is significantly higher than DDTN's 5.61% return.
JULB
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 6.38%
- 6M
- 6.05%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDTN
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- YTD
- 5.61%
- 6M
- 5.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JULB vs. DDTN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF | 6.38% | 1.10% |
DDTN Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - November | 5.61% | 0.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between JULB and DDTN is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2025 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JULB vs. DDTN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB) and Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - November (DDTN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JULB vs. DDTN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JULB drawdown since its inception was -5.24%, roughly equal to the maximum DDTN drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULB and DDTN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JULB | DDTN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.24% | -5.38% | +0.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.43% | -1.01% | +0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.83% | -0.81% | -0.02% |
Volatility
JULB vs. DDTN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JULB | DDTN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.84% | 7.83% | -0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.84% | 7.83% | -0.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.84% | 7.83% | -0.99% |
JULB vs. DDTN - Expense Ratio Comparison
JULB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DDTN's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
JULB vs. DDTN - Dividend Comparison
Neither JULB nor DDTN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, JULB and DDTN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, JULB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JULB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDTN.
JULB and DDTN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JULB and 0.79% for DDTN.
Find the right allocation for JULB and DDTN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer