PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JULB vs. DDFN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JULB vs. DDFN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB) and Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - November (DDFN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JULB achieves a 6.35% return, which is significantly higher than DDFN's 4.46% return.


JULB

1D
-0.07%
1M
2.40%
YTD
6.35%
6M
6.93%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DDFN

1D
-0.22%
1M
1.47%
YTD
4.46%
6M
5.06%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JULB vs. DDFN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JULB and DDFN is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025

0.90

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JULB vs. DDFN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB) and Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - November (DDFN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

JULB vs. DDFN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JULBDDFNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.17

1.73

+0.44

Drawdowns

JULB vs. DDFN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JULB drawdown since its inception was -5.24%, which is greater than DDFN's maximum drawdown of -3.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULB and DDFN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JULBDDFNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.24%

-3.40%

-1.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-0.22%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.87%

-0.47%

-0.40%

Volatility

JULB vs. DDFN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JULBDDFNDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.81%

5.26%

+1.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.81%

5.26%

+1.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.81%

5.26%

+1.55%

JULB vs. DDFN - Expense Ratio Comparison

JULB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DDFN's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

JULB vs. DDFN - Dividend Comparison

Neither JULB nor DDFN has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


JULB and DDFN have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JULB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JULB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDFN.

JULB and DDFN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JULB and 0.79% for DDFN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JULB and DDFN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer