PortfoliosLab logo
ARES vs. CG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ARES and CG is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

ARES vs. CG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ares Management Corporation (ARES) and The Carlyle Group Inc. (CG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ARES:

0.47

CG:

0.26

Sortino Ratio

ARES:

0.90

CG:

0.73

Omega Ratio

ARES:

1.13

CG:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

ARES:

0.51

CG:

0.38

Martin Ratio

ARES:

1.65

CG:

0.93

Ulcer Index

ARES:

12.45%

CG:

15.67%

Daily Std Dev

ARES:

40.91%

CG:

44.99%

Max Drawdown

ARES:

-45.85%

CG:

-62.70%

Current Drawdown

ARES:

-13.49%

CG:

-16.18%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ARES:

$55.57B

CG:

$17.13B

EPS

ARES:

$1.70

CG:

$2.94

PE Ratio

ARES:

100.09

CG:

16.13

PEG Ratio

ARES:

0.63

CG:

1.10

PS Ratio

ARES:

13.02

CG:

3.40

PB Ratio

ARES:

12.41

CG:

3.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

ARES:

$4.92B

CG:

$4.47B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ARES:

$2.97B

CG:

$1.24B

EBITDA (TTM)

ARES:

$1.64B

CG:

$591.50M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARES achieves a -3.13% return, which is significantly higher than CG's -5.44% return. Over the past 10 years, ARES has outperformed CG with an annualized return of 29.67%, while CG has yielded a comparatively lower 10.38% annualized return.


ARES

YTD

-3.13%

1M

20.47%

6M

3.08%

1Y

19.96%

5Y*

42.04%

10Y*

29.67%

CG

YTD

-5.44%

1M

32.31%

6M

-4.73%

1Y

12.61%

5Y*

17.29%

10Y*

10.38%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ARES vs. CG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARES
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ARES is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ARES is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ARES is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ARES is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ARES is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ARES is 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

CG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CG is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CG is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CG is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CG is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CG is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CG is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ARES vs. CG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ares Management Corporation (ARES) and The Carlyle Group Inc. (CG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ARES Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is higher than the CG Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARES and CG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

ARES vs. CG - Dividend Comparison

ARES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, more than CG's 2.21% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ARES
Ares Management Corporation
2.30%2.10%2.59%3.57%2.31%3.40%3.59%7.50%6.30%4.32%6.81%2.45%
CG
The Carlyle Group Inc.
2.21%2.77%3.38%4.11%1.82%3.18%4.24%7.87%5.41%11.02%21.70%6.84%

Drawdowns

ARES vs. CG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARES drawdown since its inception was -45.85%, smaller than the maximum CG drawdown of -62.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARES and CG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

ARES vs. CG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ares Management Corporation (ARES) is 10.22%, while The Carlyle Group Inc. (CG) has a volatility of 11.52%. This indicates that ARES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ARES vs. CG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ares Management Corporation and The Carlyle Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-500.00M0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20212022202320242025
1.09B
973.10M
(ARES) Total Revenue
(CG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items