ARES vs. CG
ARES (Ares Management Corporation) and CG (The Carlyle Group Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, ARES returned 30.44%/yr vs 16.21%/yr for CG. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
ARES vs. CG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARES achieves a -19.75% return, which is significantly higher than CG's -23.55% return. Over the past 10 years, ARES has outperformed CG with an annualized return of 30.44%, while CG has yielded a comparatively lower 16.21% annualized return.
ARES
- 1D
- -2.66%
- 1M
- 2.86%
- YTD
- -19.75%
- 6M
- -23.83%
- 1Y
- -20.36%
- 3Y*
- 15.51%
- 5Y*
- 20.25%
- 10Y*
- 30.44%
CG
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- -1.89%
- YTD
- -23.55%
- 6M
- -26.74%
- 1Y
- -2.39%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- 2.46%
- 10Y*
- 16.21%
ARES vs. CG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARES Ares Management Corporation | -19.75% | -5.72% | 52.68% | 79.52% | -12.75% | 77.75% | 37.37% | 110.13% | -5.54% | 10.72% |
CG The Carlyle Group Inc. | -23.55% | 20.20% | 28.05% | 42.55% | -43.78% | 78.46% | 1.62% | 116.75% | -27.28% | 59.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARES and CG is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2014 | 0.51 |
The correlation between ARES and CG shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (all time) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ARES:
$2.83
CG:
$1.48
ARES:
44.47
CG:
30.11
ARES:
1.77
CG:
0.19
ARES:
4.39
CG:
4.12
ARES:
$6.31B
CG:
$3.99B
ARES:
$4.46B
CG:
$2.92B
ARES:
$2.42B
CG:
$1.01B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARES vs. CG — Risk / Return Rank
ARES
CG
ARES vs. CG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ares Management Corporation (ARES) and The Carlyle Group Inc. (CG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARES | CG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.02 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | -0.06 | -0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.81 | -0.12 | -0.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARES vs. CG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARES drawdown since its inception was -49.73%, smaller than the maximum CG drawdown of -62.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARES and CG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARES | CG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.73% | -62.69% | +12.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.05% | -37.83% | -11.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.73% | -38.53% | -11.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.73% | -56.75% | +7.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.73% | -56.75% | +7.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.43% | -34.40% | +1.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.36% | -21.76% | +10.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.33% | 20.30% | +5.03% |
Volatility
ARES vs. CG - Volatility Comparison
Ares Management Corporation (ARES) has a higher volatility of 11.87% compared to The Carlyle Group Inc. (CG) at 9.17%. This indicates that ARES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARES | CG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.87% | 9.17% | +2.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.45% | 27.73% | +7.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.68% | 36.12% | +5.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.47% | 39.81% | -2.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.74% | 37.40% | -0.66% |
Dividends
ARES vs. CG - Dividend Comparison
ARES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.26%, more than CG's 3.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARES Ares Management Corporation | 5.26% | 3.29% | 2.10% | 2.59% | 3.57% | 2.31% | 3.40% | 3.59% | 7.50% | 5.65% | 4.32% | 6.81% |
CG The Carlyle Group Inc. | 3.14% | 2.37% | 2.77% | 3.38% | 4.11% | 1.82% | 3.18% | 4.24% | 7.87% | 5.41% | 11.02% | 21.70% |
Financials
ARES vs. CG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ares Management Corporation and The Carlyle Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ARES and CG have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARES has higher volatility (11.87%) compared to CG (9.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARES dropped -49.73% vs CG's -62.69%.
CG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.07 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARES and CG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer