TEAF vs. XLU
Compare and contrast key facts about Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund (TEAF) and Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLU).
XLU is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Utilities Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998.
Performance
TEAF vs. XLU - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TEAF vs. XLU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEAF Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund | 0.00% | 9.74% | 12.16% | -0.64% | -5.41% | 19.37% | -12.76% | -13.82% |
XLU Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund | 8.77% | 16.03% | 23.31% | -7.18% | 1.44% | 17.70% | 0.51% | 12.99% |
Returns By Period
TEAF
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLU
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- YTD
- 8.77%
- 6M
- 6.26%
- 1Y
- 19.98%
- 3Y*
- 14.30%
- 5Y*
- 10.90%
- 10Y*
- 9.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TEAF vs. XLU — Risk / Return Rank
TEAF
XLU
TEAF vs. XLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund (TEAF) and Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TEAF | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.41 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between TEAF and XLU is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
TEAF vs. XLU - Dividend Comparison
TEAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, more than XLU's 2.58% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEAF Ecofin Sustainable and Social Impact Term Fund | 5.16% | 7.37% | 9.00% | 9.22% | 8.25% | 6.18% | 8.17% | 5.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLU Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund | 2.58% | 2.71% | 2.96% | 3.39% | 2.92% | 2.79% | 3.14% | 2.95% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.41% | 3.67% |
Drawdowns
TEAF vs. XLU - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEAF | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -51.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -2.72% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -10.26% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.82% | — |
Volatility
TEAF vs. XLU - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TEAF | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.09% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.36% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 15.79% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 17.18% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 19.21% | — |