TDVG vs. SGRT
TDVG (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TDVG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.
Performance
TDVG vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDVG achieves a 7.68% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 51.42% return.
TDVG
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- 7.68%
- 6M
- 8.35%
- 1Y
- 17.75%
- 3Y*
- 15.70%
- 5Y*
- 10.19%
- 10Y*
- —
SGRT
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- 15.60%
- YTD
- 51.42%
- 6M
- 56.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDVG vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF | 7.68% | 4.84% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 51.42% | 25.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDVG and SGRT is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDVG vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank
TDVG
SGRT
TDVG vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TDVG | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.84 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.64 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.27 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TDVG | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 3.82 | -2.88 |
Drawdowns
TDVG vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDVG drawdown since its inception was -19.20%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDVG and SGRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDVG | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.20% | -17.87% | -1.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.76% | -3.13% | -0.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.76% | — | — |
Volatility
TDVG vs. SGRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDVG | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.26% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.51% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.67% | 33.49% | -23.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 33.49% | -19.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.93% | 33.49% | -19.56% |
TDVG vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDVG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
TDVG vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison
TDVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than SGRT's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 0.11% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF | 0.98% | 1.00% | 1.06% | 1.31% | 1.15% | 0.80% | 0.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TDVG and SGRT have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TDVG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TDVG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SGRT.
TDVG has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.11% for SGRT.
Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TDVG and 0.59% for SGRT.
Find the right allocation for TDVG and SGRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer