PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDVG vs. PVAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDVG vs. PVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) and Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDVG achieves a 7.48% return, which is significantly lower than PVAL's 11.75% return.


TDVG

1D
-0.19%
1M
3.06%
YTD
7.48%
6M
7.57%
1Y
17.02%
3Y*
15.63%
5Y*
10.03%
10Y*

PVAL

1D
-0.16%
1M
3.63%
YTD
11.75%
6M
14.36%
1Y
32.58%
3Y*
23.81%
5Y*
15.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDVG vs. PVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TDVG
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF
7.48%14.80%13.45%13.95%-10.15%13.45%
PVAL
Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF
11.75%24.13%19.30%18.41%-2.61%11.44%

Correlation

The correlation between TDVG and PVAL is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2021

0.89

The correlation between TDVG and PVAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

TDVG vs. PVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TDVG
PVAL

Technology

24.1%
11.9%

Financial Services

19.5%
19.1%

Industrials

13.6%
12.1%

Healthcare

12.9%
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

7.1%
8.3%

Energy

5.8%
8.4%

Utilities

3.9%
5.0%

Basic Materials

2.9%
4.4%

Real Estate

1.6%
2.1%

Communication Services

1.2%
5.8%

Technology

TDVG
24.1%
PVAL
11.9%

Financial Services

TDVG
19.5%
PVAL
19.1%

Industrials

TDVG
13.6%
PVAL
12.1%

Healthcare

TDVG
12.9%
PVAL
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

TDVG
7.7%
PVAL
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

TDVG
7.1%
PVAL
8.3%

Energy

TDVG
5.8%
PVAL
8.4%

Utilities

TDVG
3.9%
PVAL
5.0%

Basic Materials

TDVG
2.9%
PVAL
4.4%

Real Estate

TDVG
1.6%
PVAL
2.1%

Communication Services

TDVG
1.2%
PVAL
5.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDVG vs. PVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDVG
TDVG Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
TDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
TDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

PVAL
PVAL Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
PVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
PVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
PVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDVG vs. PVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) and Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TDVGPVALDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.77

3.04

-1.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.54

4.28

-1.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.55

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

4.53

-2.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.68

17.33

-7.64

TDVG vs. PVAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDVG Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is lower than the PVAL Sharpe Ratio of 3.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDVG and PVAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDVGPVALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

3.04

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

1.05

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

1.07

-0.13

Drawdowns

TDVG vs. PVAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDVG drawdown since its inception was -19.20%, which is greater than PVAL's maximum drawdown of -16.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDVG and PVAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDVGPVALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.20%

-16.64%

-2.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.24%

-7.22%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.02%

-15.42%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.20%

-16.64%

-2.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-0.16%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.76%

-3.02%

-0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

1.89%

-0.13%

Volatility

TDVG vs. PVAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) is 2.11%, while Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL) has a volatility of 2.30%. This indicates that TDVG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDVGPVALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.11%

2.30%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.45%

8.19%

-0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.67%

10.78%

-1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.91%

15.26%

-1.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.93%

15.24%

-1.31%

TDVG vs. PVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDVG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PVAL's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDVG vs. PVAL - Dividend Comparison

TDVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, which matches PVAL's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
PVAL
Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF
0.98%1.00%1.34%1.33%0.59%0.47%0.00%
TDVG
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF
0.98%1.00%1.06%1.31%1.15%0.80%0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDVG and PVAL have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PVAL has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to TDVG (2.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDVG dropped -19.20% vs PVAL's -16.64%.

On 5-year performance, PVAL leads with 15.96% vs 10.03% for TDVG. On fees, TDVG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, TDVG has been the lower-risk option at 2.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PVAL has performed better with a 15.96% return vs 10.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TDVG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PVAL.

TDVG and PVAL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.98%.

TDVG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PVAL is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Putnam. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TDVG and 0.55% for PVAL.

PVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.04 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDVG and PVAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer