TDVG vs. PVAL
TDVG (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF) and PVAL (Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TDVG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while PVAL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Putnam. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, TDVG returned 10.03%/yr vs 15.96%/yr for PVAL. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TDVG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PVAL.
Performance
TDVG vs. PVAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDVG achieves a 7.48% return, which is significantly lower than PVAL's 11.75% return.
TDVG
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- YTD
- 7.48%
- 6M
- 7.57%
- 1Y
- 17.02%
- 3Y*
- 15.63%
- 5Y*
- 10.03%
- 10Y*
- —
PVAL
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 3.63%
- YTD
- 11.75%
- 6M
- 14.36%
- 1Y
- 32.58%
- 3Y*
- 23.81%
- 5Y*
- 15.96%
- 10Y*
- —
TDVG vs. PVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF | 7.48% | 14.80% | 13.45% | 13.95% | -10.15% | 13.45% |
PVAL Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF | 11.75% | 24.13% | 19.30% | 18.41% | -2.61% | 11.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDVG and PVAL is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2021 | 0.89 |
The correlation between TDVG and PVAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
TDVG vs. PVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TDVG
PVAL
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
Technology
TDVG
PVAL
Financial Services
TDVG
PVAL
Industrials
TDVG
PVAL
Healthcare
TDVG
PVAL
Consumer Cyclical
TDVG
PVAL
Consumer Defensive
TDVG
PVAL
Energy
TDVG
PVAL
Utilities
TDVG
PVAL
Basic Materials
TDVG
PVAL
Real Estate
TDVG
PVAL
Communication Services
TDVG
PVAL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDVG vs. PVAL — Risk / Return Rank
TDVG
PVAL
TDVG vs. PVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) and Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TDVG | PVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.77 | 3.04 | -1.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.54 | 4.28 | -1.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.55 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 4.53 | -2.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.68 | 17.33 | -7.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TDVG | PVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.77 | 3.04 | -1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 1.05 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 1.07 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
TDVG vs. PVAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDVG drawdown since its inception was -19.20%, which is greater than PVAL's maximum drawdown of -16.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDVG and PVAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDVG | PVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.20% | -16.64% | -2.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.24% | -7.22% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.02% | -15.42% | +1.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.20% | -16.64% | -2.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -0.16% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.76% | -3.02% | -0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.76% | 1.89% | -0.13% |
Volatility
TDVG vs. PVAL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) is 2.11%, while Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL) has a volatility of 2.30%. This indicates that TDVG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDVG | PVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.11% | 2.30% | -0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.45% | 8.19% | -0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.67% | 10.78% | -1.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 15.26% | -1.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.93% | 15.24% | -1.31% |
TDVG vs. PVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDVG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PVAL's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
TDVG vs. PVAL - Dividend Comparison
TDVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, which matches PVAL's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PVAL Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF | 0.98% | 1.00% | 1.34% | 1.33% | 0.59% | 0.47% | 0.00% |
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF | 0.98% | 1.00% | 1.06% | 1.31% | 1.15% | 0.80% | 0.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TDVG and PVAL have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PVAL has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to TDVG (2.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDVG dropped -19.20% vs PVAL's -16.64%.
On 5-year performance, PVAL leads with 15.96% vs 10.03% for TDVG. On fees, TDVG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, TDVG has been the lower-risk option at 2.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PVAL has performed better with a 15.96% return vs 10.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TDVG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PVAL.
TDVG and PVAL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.98%.
TDVG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PVAL is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Putnam. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TDVG and 0.55% for PVAL.
PVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.04 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TDVG and PVAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer