PVAL vs. BMAR
Compare and contrast key facts about Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (BMAR).
PVAL and BMAR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PVAL is a passively managed fund by Power Corporation of Canada that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Value. It was launched on May 25, 2021. BMAR is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index March Series. It was launched on Mar 2, 2020. Both PVAL and BMAR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PVAL or BMAR.
Key characteristics
| PVAL | BMAR | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 11.88% | 3.31% |
| 1Y Return | 29.64% | 17.00% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.61 | 2.33 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.00% | 7.90% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.64% | -21.43% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.57% | -1.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between PVAL and BMAR is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
PVAL vs. BMAR - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, PVAL achieves a 11.88% return, which is significantly higher than BMAR's 3.31% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PVAL vs. BMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PVAL has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than BMAR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PVAL vs. BMAR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (BMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PVAL vs. BMAR - Dividend Comparison
PVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, while BMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PVAL Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF | 1.51% | 1.33% | 0.59% | 0.47% |
BMAR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PVAL vs. BMAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PVAL drawdown since its inception was -16.64%, smaller than the maximum BMAR drawdown of -21.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PVAL and BMAR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PVAL vs. BMAR - Volatility Comparison
Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL) has a higher volatility of 3.01% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (BMAR) at 2.56%. This indicates that PVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.