TDV vs. SQQQ
TDV (ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - TDV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Zacks 2040 Lifecycle Index, while SQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TDV returned 12.05%/yr vs -45.39%/yr for SQQQ. At a correlation of -0.84, they often move in opposite directions. TDV charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SQQQ.
Performance
TDV vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDV achieves a 13.15% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -36.02% return.
TDV
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -4.21%
- 6M
- 8.36%
- YTD
- 13.15%
- 1Y
- 16.87%
- 3Y*
- 14.33%
- 5Y*
- 12.05%
- 10Y*
- —
SQQQ
- 1D
- 4.65%
- 1M
- 10.00%
- 6M
- -34.17%
- YTD
- -36.02%
- 1Y
- -51.09%
- 3Y*
- -49.80%
- 5Y*
- -45.39%
- 10Y*
- -54.92%
TDV vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 13.15% | 16.05% | 9.72% | 27.29% | -15.94% | 28.29% | 29.00% | 2.86% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -36.02% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -60.87% | -86.40% | -17.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDV and SQQQ is -0.82, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2019 | -0.84 |
The correlation between TDV and SQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.85 to -0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
TDV vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TDV
SQQQ
Technology
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
TDV
SQQQ
-
Financial Services
TDV
SQQQ
Industrials
TDV
SQQQ
-
Basic Materials
TDV
-
SQQQ
-
Communication Services
TDV
-
SQQQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
TDV
-
SQQQ
-
Consumer Defensive
TDV
-
SQQQ
-
Energy
TDV
-
SQQQ
-
Healthcare
TDV
-
SQQQ
-
Real Estate
TDV
-
SQQQ
-
Utilities
TDV
-
SQQQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDV vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
TDV
SQQQ
TDV vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TDV | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.85 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | -0.84 | +2.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.20 | -1.53 | +6.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TDV vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDV drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDV and SQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDV | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.78% | -100.00% | +67.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.55% | -61.03% | +51.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.51% | -92.51% | +70.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.11% | -97.27% | +72.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.46% | -100.00% | +91.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.35% | -92.76% | +87.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | 33.52% | -30.27% |
Volatility
TDV vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) is 7.37%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 22.12%. This indicates that TDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDV | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.37% | 22.12% | -14.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.40% | 46.34% | -30.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.20% | 56.08% | -36.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.83% | 67.92% | -47.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.30% | 66.58% | -43.28% |
TDV vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDV has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than SQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TDV vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison
TDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than SQQQ's 9.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 9.34% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% |
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 1.07% | 1.09% | 1.16% | 1.16% | 1.67% | 1.08% | 1.10% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TDV and SQQQ have a correlation of -0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQQQ has higher volatility (22.12%) compared to TDV (7.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDV dropped -32.78% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.
On 5-year performance, TDV leads with 12.05% vs -45.39% for SQQQ. On fees, TDV is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, TDV has been the lower-risk option at 7.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TDV has performed better with a 12.05% return vs -45.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TDV is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.34%, compared with 1.07% for TDV.
TDV is categorized as Technology Equities, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. TDV tracks Zacks 2040 Lifecycle Index, while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 0.66% for TDV and 0.95% for SQQQ.
TDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TDV and SQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer