PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDTT vs. VTP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDTT vs. VTP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDTT achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly higher than VTP's 0.86% return.


TDTT

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.12%
6M
1.41%
YTD
1.41%
1Y
2.98%
3Y*
4.86%
5Y*
2.66%
10Y*
3.02%

VTP

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.62%
6M
0.58%
YTD
0.86%
1Y
3.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDTT vs. VTP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TDTT and VTP is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025

0.77

The correlation between TDTT and VTP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDTT vs. VTP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDTT
TDTT Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TDTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDTT Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
TDTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDTT Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

VTP
VTP Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
VTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTP Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
VTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTP Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDTT vs. VTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TDTTVTPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.17

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

1.66

+1.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.74

4.69

+4.05

TDTT vs. VTP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDTT Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the VTP Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDTT and VTP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TDTT vs. VTP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDTT drawdown since its inception was -6.97%, which is greater than VTP's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDTT and VTP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDTTVTPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

-1.92%

-5.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.97%

-1.92%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-0.97%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.59%

-0.53%

-1.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

0.68%

-0.34%

Volatility

TDTT vs. VTP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT) is 0.81%, while Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP) has a volatility of 1.19%. This indicates that TDTT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDTTVTPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

1.19%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.43%

2.47%

-1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93%

3.35%

-1.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.66%

3.33%

+0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.38%

3.33%

+0.05%

TDTT vs. VTP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDTT has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VTP's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TDTT vs. VTP - Dividend Comparison

TDTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%, more than VTP's 2.98% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
TDTT
FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund
5.14%4.52%4.01%3.88%6.97%4.53%1.15%1.91%2.48%1.88%1.01%
VTP
Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF
2.98%1.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDTT and VTP have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTP has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to TDTT (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDTT dropped -6.97% vs VTP's -1.92%.

On 1-year performance, VTP leads with 3.18% vs 2.98% for TDTT. On fees, VTP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, TDTT has been the lower-risk option at 0.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VTP has performed better with a 3.18% return vs 2.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for TDTT.

TDTT has the higher dividend yield at 5.14%, compared with 2.98% for VTP.

TDTT tracks iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS, while VTP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for TDTT and 0.05% for VTP.

TDTT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDTT and VTP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer