TDSC vs. XOMO
TDSC (Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF) and XOMO (YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TDSC is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while XOMO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TDSC returned 20.40% vs 30.87% for XOMO. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TDSC charges 0.69%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for XOMO.
Performance
TDSC vs. XOMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDSC achieves a 11.58% return, which is significantly lower than XOMO's 17.25% return.
TDSC
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 3.52%
- YTD
- 11.58%
- 6M
- 11.52%
- 1Y
- 20.40%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- 3.44%
- 10Y*
- —
XOMO
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -1.15%
- YTD
- 17.25%
- 6M
- 19.54%
- 1Y
- 30.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDSC vs. XOMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TDSC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF | 11.58% | 6.56% | 7.10% | 8.75% |
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 17.25% | 6.90% | 6.11% | -8.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDSC and XOMO is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2023 | 0.26 |
The correlation between TDSC and XOMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDSC vs. XOMO — Risk / Return Rank
TDSC
XOMO
TDSC vs. XOMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TDSC | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.30 | 1.55 | +0.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.24 | 2.06 | +1.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.27 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.85 | 2.26 | +1.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.00 | 6.35 | +8.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TDSC | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 1.55 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.39 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
TDSC vs. XOMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDSC drawdown since its inception was -21.51%, which is greater than XOMO's maximum drawdown of -18.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDSC and XOMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDSC | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.51% | -18.90% | -2.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.35% | -13.73% | +8.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -9.89% | +9.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.39% | -7.21% | -2.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.37% | 4.88% | -3.51% |
Volatility
TDSC vs. XOMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC) is 2.12%, while YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) has a volatility of 7.53%. This indicates that TDSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDSC | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.12% | 7.53% | -5.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.64% | 16.61% | -9.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.89% | 20.07% | -11.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.28% | 18.95% | -8.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.23% | 18.95% | -8.72% |
TDSC vs. XOMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDSC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than XOMO's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
TDSC vs. XOMO - Dividend Comparison
TDSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than XOMO's 34.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDSC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF | 2.00% | 2.92% | 2.06% | 2.06% | 1.76% | 1.11% | 0.54% |
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 34.77% | 31.64% | 26.94% | 5.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TDSC and XOMO have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOMO has higher volatility (7.53%) compared to TDSC (2.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDSC dropped -21.51% vs XOMO's -18.90%.
On 1-year performance, XOMO leads with 30.87% vs 20.40% for TDSC. On fees, TDSC is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, TDSC has been the lower-risk option at 2.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XOMO has performed better with a 30.87% return vs 20.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TDSC is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for XOMO.
XOMO has the higher dividend yield at 34.77%, compared with 2.00% for TDSC.
TDSC is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while XOMO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TDSC and 1.01% for XOMO.
TDSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TDSC and XOMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer