TDSC vs. TBFG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TDSC (Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF) and TBFG (The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TDSC returned 16.68% vs 21.35% for TBFG. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TDSC charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for TBFG.

Performance

TDSC vs. TBFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC) and The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TDSC having a 8.99% return and TBFG slightly lower at 8.68%.

TDSC

• 1D: -0.84%
• 1M: -1.31%
• YTD: 8.99%
• 6M: 8.11%
• 1Y: 16.68%
• 3Y*: 10.55%
• 5Y*: 2.67%
• 10Y*: —

TBFG

• 1D: -1.55%
• 1M: 0.04%
• YTD: 8.68%
• 6M: 8.23%
• 1Y: 21.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDSC vs. TBFG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TDSC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF	8.99%	6.56%	7.80%
TBFG The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF	8.68%	14.56%	10.20%

Correlation

The correlation between TDSC and TBFG is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2024	0.88

The correlation between TDSC and TBFG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TDSC vs. TBFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDSC

TDSC Risk / Return Rank: 61
TDSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
TDSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
TDSC Omega Ratio Rank: 54
TDSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
TDSC Martin Ratio Rank: 68

TBFG

TBFG Risk / Return Rank: 67
TBFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
TBFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
TBFG Omega Ratio Rank: 70
TBFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
TBFG Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDSC vs. TBFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC) and The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TDSC	TBFG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	2.03	-0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	2.81	-0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.38	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.13	2.81	+0.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.61	11.85	-0.25

TDSC vs. TBFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the TBFG Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDSC and TBFG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TDSC vs. TBFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDSC drawdown since its inception was -21.51%, which is greater than TBFG's maximum drawdown of -13.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDSC and TBFG.

Drawdown Indicators

	TDSC	TBFG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.51%	-13.43%	-8.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.35%	-7.63%	+2.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.47%	-1.87%	-0.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.31%	-1.62%	-7.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.44%	1.81%	-0.37%

Volatility

TDSC vs. TBFG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC) is 3.67%, while The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG) has a volatility of 4.66%. This indicates that TDSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TBFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TDSC	TBFG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.67%	4.66%	-0.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.31%	9.00%	-1.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.42%	10.55%	-1.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.38%	11.18%	-0.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.27%	11.18%	-0.91%

TDSC vs. TBFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDSC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than TBFG's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

TDSC vs. TBFG - Dividend Comparison

TDSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, less than TBFG's 2.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
TBFG The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF	2.39%	2.65%	2.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TDSC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF	2.05%	2.92%	2.06%	2.06%	1.76%	1.11%	0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TDSC and TBFG in my portfolio?

TDSC and TBFG have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TDSC or TBFG?

TBFG has higher volatility (4.66%) compared to TDSC (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDSC dropped -21.51% vs TBFG's -13.43%.

Which ETF is better, TDSC or TBFG?

On 1-year performance, TBFG leads with 21.35% vs 16.68% for TDSC. On fees, TBFG is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, TDSC has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TDSC or TBFG?

Over the 1-year period, TBFG has performed better with a 21.35% return vs 16.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TDSC or TBFG?

TBFG is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for TDSC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TDSC or TBFG?

TBFG has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 2.05% for TDSC.

What is the main difference between TDSC and TBFG?

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and The Brinsmere Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TDSC and 0.42% for TBFG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TBFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.