TDSC vs. GDT
TDSC (Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF) and GDT (WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TDSC charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for GDT.
Performance
TDSC vs. GDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TDSC
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 11.42%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 19.88%
- 3Y*
- 11.01%
- 5Y*
- 3.28%
- 10Y*
- —
GDT
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -1.71%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDSC vs. GDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TDSC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF | 7.92% |
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | -8.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDSC and GDT is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2026 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDSC vs. GDT — Risk / Return Rank
TDSC
GDT
TDSC vs. GDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC) and WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TDSC | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.74 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.51 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TDSC | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | -0.63 | +1.03 |
Drawdowns
TDSC vs. GDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDSC drawdown since its inception was -21.51%, which is greater than GDT's maximum drawdown of -18.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDSC and GDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDSC | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.51% | -18.06% | -3.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -16.07% | +15.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.38% | -9.90% | +0.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.37% | — | — |
Volatility
TDSC vs. GDT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDSC | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.06% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.61% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.90% | 33.36% | -24.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.28% | 33.36% | -23.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.22% | 33.36% | -23.14% |
TDSC vs. GDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDSC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than GDT's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
TDSC vs. GDT - Dividend Comparison
TDSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, more than GDT's 1.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | 1.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDSC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF | 2.01% | 2.92% | 2.06% | 2.06% | 1.76% | 1.11% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TDSC and GDT have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for TDSC.
TDSC has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 1.77% for GDT.
They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TDSC and 0.30% for GDT.
Find the right allocation for TDSC and GDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer