TDSB vs. ESBG
TDSB (Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF) and ESBG (First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TDSB charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for ESBG.
Performance
TDSB vs. ESBG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDSB achieves a 4.70% return, which is significantly lower than ESBG's 6.36% return.
TDSB
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 4.70%
- 6M
- 4.73%
- 1Y
- 15.07%
- 3Y*
- 8.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.30%
- 10Y*
- —
ESBG
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 6.36%
- 6M
- 8.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDSB vs. ESBG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TDSB Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF | 4.70% | 1.12% |
ESBG First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF | 6.36% | 5.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDSB and ESBG is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDSB vs. ESBG — Risk / Return Rank
TDSB
ESBG
TDSB vs. ESBG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB) and First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF (ESBG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TDSB | ESBG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.53 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.48 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.29 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TDSB | ESBG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 1.00 | -0.68 |
Drawdowns
TDSB vs. ESBG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDSB drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, roughly equal to the maximum ESBG drawdown of -18.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDSB and ESBG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDSB | ESBG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.56% | -18.84% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -9.80% | +9.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.13% | -6.21% | -2.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.17% | — | — |
Volatility
TDSB vs. ESBG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDSB | ESBG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.67% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.04% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.98% | 25.31% | -19.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.32% | 25.31% | -17.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.53% | 25.31% | -17.78% |
TDSB vs. ESBG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDSB has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than ESBG's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TDSB vs. ESBG - Dividend Comparison
TDSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, more than ESBG's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESBG First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF | 0.57% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDSB Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF | 2.12% | 1.93% | 3.50% | 2.77% | 1.81% | 1.75% | 0.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TDSB and ESBG have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TDSB is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TDSB is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ESBG.
TDSB has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 0.57% for ESBG.
They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TDSB and 0.95% for ESBG.
Find the right allocation for TDSB and ESBG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer