PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDSB vs. ARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDSB vs. ARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB) and Pmv Adaptive Risk Parity ETF (ARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDSB achieves a 3.51% return, which is significantly lower than ARP's 8.51% return.


TDSB

1D
-0.16%
1M
-1.10%
YTD
3.51%
6M
3.34%
1Y
13.33%
3Y*
8.59%
5Y*
1.93%
10Y*

ARP

1D
-0.18%
1M
-1.63%
YTD
8.51%
6M
7.32%
1Y
23.54%
3Y*
14.35%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDSB vs. ARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TDSB
Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF
3.51%12.95%3.56%4.71%-0.58%
ARP
Pmv Adaptive Risk Parity ETF
8.51%18.33%13.79%3.66%-0.82%

Correlation

The correlation between TDSB and ARP is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2022

0.56

Over the past year, TDSB and ARP have become more correlated (0.80) than their long-term average of 0.56, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDSB vs. ARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDSB
TDSB Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TDSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDSB Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
TDSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDSB Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

ARP
ARP Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
ARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARP Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARP Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDSB vs. ARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB) and Pmv Adaptive Risk Parity ETF (ARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TDSBARPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.33

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

2.34

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.87

8.49

+2.38

TDSB vs. ARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDSB Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the ARP Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDSB and ARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TDSB vs. ARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDSB drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, which is greater than ARP's maximum drawdown of -10.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDSB and ARP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDSBARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.56%

-10.13%

-9.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.64%

-10.13%

+5.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.84%

-10.13%

+3.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.88%

-3.05%

+1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.07%

-1.84%

-7.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.23%

2.78%

-1.55%

Volatility

TDSB vs. ARP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB) is 2.27%, while Pmv Adaptive Risk Parity ETF (ARP) has a volatility of 5.20%. This indicates that TDSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDSBARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.27%

5.20%

-2.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.37%

12.68%

-7.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.32%

14.40%

-8.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.36%

10.33%

-2.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.55%

10.33%

-2.78%

TDSB vs. ARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDSB has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than ARP's 1.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDSB vs. ARP - Dividend Comparison

TDSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, less than ARP's 6.03% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ARP
Pmv Adaptive Risk Parity ETF
6.03%6.54%5.29%2.67%0.06%0.00%0.00%
TDSB
Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF
2.15%1.93%3.50%2.77%1.81%1.75%0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDSB and ARP have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARP has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to TDSB (2.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDSB dropped -19.56% vs ARP's -10.13%.

On 3-year performance, ARP leads with 14.35% vs 8.59% for TDSB. On fees, TDSB is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, TDSB has been the lower-risk option at 2.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ARP has performed better with a 14.35% return vs 8.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TDSB is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.42% for ARP.

ARP has the higher dividend yield at 6.03%, compared with 2.15% for TDSB.

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and PMV. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TDSB and 1.42% for ARP.

TDSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDSB and ARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer