PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDSB vs. CEFS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TDSB vs. CEFS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TDSB vs. CEFS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TDSB
Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF
2.22%12.95%3.56%4.71%-16.83%8.44%-1.17%
CEFS
Saba Closed-End Funds ETF
-0.33%16.67%23.48%20.99%-7.08%17.86%6.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDSB achieves a 2.22% return, which is significantly higher than CEFS's -0.33% return.


TDSB

1D
0.97%
1M
-2.99%
YTD
2.22%
6M
5.61%
1Y
11.78%
3Y*
8.21%
5Y*
2.25%
10Y*

CEFS

1D
2.04%
1M
-2.99%
YTD
-0.33%
6M
3.31%
1Y
14.56%
3Y*
17.06%
5Y*
11.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TDSB vs. CEFS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDSB has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than CEFS's 3.80% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TDSB vs. CEFS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDSB
TDSB Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
TDSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDSB Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
TDSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDSB Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

CEFS
CEFS Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CEFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEFS Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
CEFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEFS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDSB vs. CEFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TDSBCEFSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.58

1.11

+0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.10

1.54

+0.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.25

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

1.43

+0.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.44

6.94

+1.50

TDSB vs. CEFS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDSB Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the CEFS Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDSB and CEFS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDSBCEFSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

1.11

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.90

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.70

-0.43

Correlation

The correlation between TDSB and CEFS is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

TDSB vs. CEFS - Dividend Comparison

TDSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than CEFS's 8.01% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
TDSB
Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF
2.17%1.93%3.50%2.77%1.81%1.75%0.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CEFS
Saba Closed-End Funds ETF
8.01%7.84%8.79%9.20%11.32%10.73%8.61%8.10%10.43%5.02%

Drawdowns

TDSB vs. CEFS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDSB drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, smaller than the maximum CEFS drawdown of -38.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDSB and CEFS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TDSBCEFSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.56%

-38.99%

+19.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.02%

-9.80%

+3.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.56%

-16.85%

-2.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.10%

-3.75%

+0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.37%

-3.73%

-5.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.49%

2.02%

-0.53%

Volatility

TDSB vs. CEFS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB) is 2.72%, while Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that TDSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TDSBCEFSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.72%

4.75%

-2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.11%

7.46%

-2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.51%

13.15%

-5.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.38%

12.99%

-5.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.58%

15.38%

-7.80%