CEFS vs. PEX
Compare and contrast key facts about Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) and ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX).
CEFS and PEX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CEFS is an actively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts. It was launched on Mar 21, 2017. PEX is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the LPX Direct Listed Private Equity Index. It was launched on Feb 26, 2013.
Performance
CEFS vs. PEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CEFS vs. PEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF | -0.33% | 16.67% | 23.48% | 20.99% | -7.08% | 17.86% | 3.40% | 28.41% | -9.97% | 7.63% |
PEX ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF | -13.96% | 0.21% | 13.05% | 23.11% | -25.98% | 28.34% | -1.14% | 25.53% | -13.31% | 2.59% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEFS achieves a -0.33% return, which is significantly higher than PEX's -13.96% return.
CEFS
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- -2.99%
- YTD
- -0.33%
- 6M
- 3.31%
- 1Y
- 14.56%
- 3Y*
- 17.06%
- 5Y*
- 11.58%
- 10Y*
- —
PEX
- 1D
- 2.67%
- 1M
- -6.84%
- YTD
- -13.96%
- 6M
- -15.90%
- 1Y
- -12.72%
- 3Y*
- 4.51%
- 5Y*
- 0.04%
- 10Y*
- 4.38%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CEFS vs. PEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEFS has a 3.80% expense ratio, which is higher than PEX's 3.13% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CEFS vs. PEX — Risk / Return Rank
CEFS
PEX
CEFS vs. PEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) and ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEFS | PEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.11 | -0.68 | +1.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | -0.87 | +2.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 0.89 | +0.36 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | -0.54 | +1.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.94 | -1.39 | +8.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEFS | PEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | -0.68 | +1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.00 | +0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.25 | +0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between CEFS and PEX is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CEFS vs. PEX - Dividend Comparison
CEFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.01%, less than PEX's 13.04% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF | 8.01% | 7.84% | 8.79% | 9.20% | 11.32% | 10.73% | 8.61% | 8.10% | 10.43% | 5.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PEX ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF | 13.04% | 12.80% | 14.11% | 13.02% | 1.77% | 13.64% | 5.52% | 7.94% | 4.72% | 24.26% | 3.24% | 12.50% |
Drawdowns
CEFS vs. PEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEFS drawdown since its inception was -38.99%, smaller than the maximum PEX drawdown of -49.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEFS and PEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEFS | PEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.99% | -49.17% | +10.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.80% | -24.72% | +14.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.85% | -36.58% | +19.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.75% | -22.24% | +18.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.73% | -8.08% | +4.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | 9.64% | -7.62% |
Volatility
CEFS vs. PEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) is 4.75%, while ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX) has a volatility of 6.62%. This indicates that CEFS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CEFS | PEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.75% | 6.62% | -1.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.46% | 11.91% | -4.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.15% | 18.91% | -5.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.99% | 17.81% | -4.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.38% | 19.38% | -4.00% |