PortfoliosLab logo
CEFS vs. HNDL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CEFS and HNDL is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CEFS vs. HNDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) and Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7HANDL Index ETF (HNDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CEFS:

1.00

HNDL:

0.58

Sortino Ratio

CEFS:

1.41

HNDL:

0.92

Omega Ratio

CEFS:

1.21

HNDL:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

CEFS:

1.06

HNDL:

0.62

Martin Ratio

CEFS:

4.49

HNDL:

2.57

Ulcer Index

CEFS:

3.16%

HNDL:

2.94%

Daily Std Dev

CEFS:

13.92%

HNDL:

12.93%

Max Drawdown

CEFS:

-38.99%

HNDL:

-23.72%

Current Drawdown

CEFS:

-3.85%

HNDL:

-4.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEFS achieves a 2.09% return, which is significantly higher than HNDL's -0.16% return.


CEFS

YTD

2.09%

1M

4.75%

6M

-0.14%

1Y

13.84%

5Y*

16.23%

10Y*

N/A

HNDL

YTD

-0.16%

1M

2.42%

6M

-2.76%

1Y

7.40%

5Y*

4.80%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CEFS vs. HNDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEFS has a 3.80% expense ratio, which is higher than HNDL's 0.97% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CEFS vs. HNDL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEFS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CEFS is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CEFS is 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CEFS is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CEFS is 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CEFS is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CEFS is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

HNDL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HNDL is 6666
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HNDL is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HNDL is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HNDL is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HNDL is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HNDL is 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CEFS vs. HNDL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) and Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7HANDL Index ETF (HNDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CEFS Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is higher than the HNDL Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEFS and HNDL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CEFS vs. HNDL - Dividend Comparison

CEFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.83%, more than HNDL's 7.22% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
CEFS
Saba Closed-End Funds ETF
8.83%8.79%9.20%11.32%10.73%8.61%7.56%9.84%6.28%
HNDL
Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7HANDL Index ETF
7.22%7.02%6.78%7.87%6.86%6.69%6.39%6.91%0.00%

Drawdowns

CEFS vs. HNDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEFS drawdown since its inception was -38.99%, which is greater than HNDL's maximum drawdown of -23.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEFS and HNDL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CEFS vs. HNDL - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...