TDIV vs. QDPL

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

TDIV (First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund) and QDPL (Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TDIV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index, while QDPL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Index - Series 400. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TDIV returned 16.92%/yr vs 12.24%/yr for QDPL. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TDIV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QDPL.

Performance

TDIV vs. QDPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDIV achieves a 20.64% return, which is significantly higher than QDPL's 12.23% return.

TDIV

• 1D: 3.50%
• 1M: 4.31%
• 6M: 19.61%
• YTD: 20.64%
• 1Y: 29.74%
• 3Y*: 27.65%
• 5Y*: 16.92%
• 10Y*: 17.38%
• ALL TIME*: 15.98%

QDPL

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: 2.59%
• 6M: 11.02%
• YTD: 12.23%
• 1Y: 21.56%
• 3Y*: 19.73%
• 5Y*: 12.24%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF	$5.38M	$5.28M	$6.16M
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund	$13.49M	$12.95M	$15.18M

TDIV vs. QDPL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund	20.64%	25.27%	24.43%	36.71%	-22.13%	10.06%
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF	12.23%	16.52%	22.83%	23.66%	-16.25%	7.82%

Correlation

The correlation between TDIV and QDPL is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2021	0.85

The correlation between TDIV and QDPL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

TDIV vs. QDPL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TDIV	QDPL
Technology	83.2%	31.0%
Communication Services	15.0%	7.6%
Industrials	1.9%	6.3%
Basic Materials	-	1.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	7.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	3.8%
Energy	-	2.8%
Financial Services	-	10.0%
Healthcare	-	7.5%
Real Estate	-	1.6%
Utilities	-	2.2%

Return for Risk

TDIV vs. QDPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TDIV

TDIV Risk / Return Rank: 47
TDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
TDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
TDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 48
TDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
TDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 42

QDPL

QDPL Risk / Return Rank: 67
QDPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
QDPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
QDPL Omega Ratio Rank: 64
QDPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
QDPL Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TDIV vs. QDPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TDIV	QDPL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	1.72	-0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	2.41	-0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.31	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.83	2.51	-0.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.99	10.80	-5.81

TDIV vs. QDPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the QDPL Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDIV and QDPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TDIV vs. QDPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDIV drawdown since its inception was -31.97%, which is greater than QDPL's maximum drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDIV and QDPL.

Drawdown Indicators

	TDIV	QDPL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.97%	-22.59%	-9.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.34%	-8.65%	-7.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.00%	-17.75%	-5.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.97%	-22.59%	-9.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.26%	0.00%	-9.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.92%	-5.03%	+0.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.97%	2.00%	+3.97%

Volatility

TDIV vs. QDPL - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) has a higher volatility of 6.55% compared to Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) at 3.45%. This indicates that TDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TDIV	QDPL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.55%	3.45%	+3.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.62%	10.06%	+6.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.93%	12.67%	+8.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.18%	15.05%	+6.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.03%	15.00%	+6.03%

TDIV vs. QDPL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDIV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than QDPL's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

TDIV vs. QDPL - Dividend Comparison

TDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than QDPL's 4.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF	4.46%	4.84%	5.43%	6.30%	7.27%	2.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund	1.30%	1.40%	1.59%	1.74%	2.51%	1.76%	2.07%	2.27%	2.97%	2.27%	2.45%	2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TDIV and QDPL in my portfolio?

TDIV and QDPL have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TDIV or QDPL?

TDIV has higher volatility (6.55%) compared to QDPL (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDIV dropped -31.97% vs QDPL's -22.59%.

Which ETF is better, TDIV or QDPL?

On 5-year performance, TDIV leads with 16.92% vs 12.24% for QDPL. On fees, TDIV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, QDPL has been the lower-risk option at 3.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TDIV or QDPL?

Over the 5-year period, TDIV has performed better with a 16.92% return vs 12.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TDIV or QDPL?

TDIV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QDPL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TDIV or QDPL?

QDPL has the higher dividend yield at 4.46%, compared with 1.30% for TDIV.

What is the main difference between TDIV and QDPL?

TDIV is categorized as Technology Equities, while QDPL is Large Cap Blend Equities. TDIV tracks NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index, while QDPL tracks Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Index - Series 400. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TDIV and 0.60% for QDPL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QDPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.