TDIV vs. LEAD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TDIV (First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund) and LEAD (Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TDIV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index, while LEAD is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TDIV returned 19.34%/yr vs 14.71%/yr for LEAD. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TDIV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for LEAD.

Performance

TDIV vs. LEAD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) and Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDIV achieves a 30.57% return, which is significantly higher than LEAD's 15.75% return. Over the past 10 years, TDIV has outperformed LEAD with an annualized return of 19.34%, while LEAD has yielded a comparatively lower 14.71% annualized return.

TDIV

• 1D: -1.79%
• 1M: 15.82%
• YTD: 30.57%
• 6M: 28.79%
• 1Y: 53.63%
• 3Y*: 33.27%
• 5Y*: 19.29%
• 10Y*: 19.34%

LEAD

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 4.84%
• YTD: 15.75%
• 6M: 14.25%
• 1Y: 25.56%
• 3Y*: 19.23%
• 5Y*: 12.16%
• 10Y*: 14.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDIV vs. LEAD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund	30.57%	25.27%	24.43%	36.71%	-22.13%	29.49%	17.55%	33.27%	-3.18%	21.95%
LEAD Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF	15.75%	15.52%	10.32%	26.25%	-18.16%	29.69%	23.41%	33.75%	-6.63%	24.89%

Correlation

The correlation between TDIV and LEAD is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2016	0.81

The correlation between TDIV and LEAD shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TDIV vs. LEAD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TDIV	LEAD
Technology	85.0%	36.5%
Communication Services	13.4%	0.1%
Industrials	1.6%	31.1%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	1.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	3.8%
Energy	-	1.3%
Financial Services	-	16.2%
Healthcare	-	5.7%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

TDIV vs. LEAD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDIV

TDIV Risk / Return Rank: 83
TDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
TDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
TDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 80
TDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
TDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 79

LEAD

LEAD Risk / Return Rank: 56
LEAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
LEAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
LEAD Omega Ratio Rank: 49
LEAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
LEAD Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDIV vs. LEAD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) and Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TDIV	LEAD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.93	1.77	+1.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.85	2.47	+1.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.31	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.02	2.97	+2.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.64	12.66	+2.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TDIV vs. LEAD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is higher than the LEAD Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDIV and LEAD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TDIV	LEAD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.93	1.77	+1.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94	0.71	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93	0.79	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.88	0.80	+0.08

Drawdowns

TDIV vs. LEAD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDIV drawdown since its inception was -31.97%, roughly equal to the maximum LEAD drawdown of -32.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDIV and LEAD.

Drawdown Indicators

	TDIV	LEAD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.97%	-32.19%	+0.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.74%	-8.65%	-2.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.00%	-17.86%	-5.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.97%	-24.93%	-7.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.97%	-32.19%	+0.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.79%	0.00%	-1.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.84%	-4.42%	-0.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.44%	2.02%	+1.42%

Volatility

TDIV vs. LEAD - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) has a higher volatility of 6.86% compared to Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD) at 4.12%. This indicates that TDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LEAD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TDIV	LEAD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.86%	4.12%	+2.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.91%	11.33%	+2.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.47%	14.56%	+3.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.67%	17.34%	+3.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.85%	18.65%	+2.20%

TDIV vs. LEAD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDIV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LEAD's 0.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

TDIV vs. LEAD - Dividend Comparison

TDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, more than LEAD's 0.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LEAD Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF	0.58%	0.70%	0.93%	1.13%	1.27%	1.79%	0.81%	1.32%	1.38%	0.97%	1.38%	0.00%
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund	1.12%	1.40%	1.59%	1.74%	2.51%	1.76%	2.07%	2.27%	2.97%	2.27%	2.45%	2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TDIV and LEAD in my portfolio?

TDIV and LEAD have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TDIV or LEAD?

TDIV has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to LEAD (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDIV dropped -31.97% vs LEAD's -32.19%.

Which ETF is better, TDIV or LEAD?

On 10-year performance, TDIV leads with 19.34% vs 14.71% for LEAD. On fees, LEAD is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, LEAD has been the lower-risk option at 4.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TDIV or LEAD?

Over the 10-year period, TDIV has performed better with a 19.34% return vs 14.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TDIV or LEAD?

LEAD is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDIV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TDIV or LEAD?

TDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.58% for LEAD.

What is the main difference between TDIV and LEAD?

TDIV is categorized as Technology Equities, while LEAD is Large Cap Growth Equities. TDIV tracks NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index, while LEAD tracks Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TDIV and 0.43% for LEAD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.