PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDIFX vs. SWYMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDIFX vs. SWYMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Retirement Income Fund (TDIFX) and Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund (SWYMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDIFX achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly lower than SWYMX's 9.96% return.


TDIFX

1D
-0.32%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
2.88%
6M
2.54%
1Y
6.39%
3Y*
6.67%
5Y*
4.91%
10Y*
5.06%

SWYMX

1D
-1.56%
1M
0.00%
YTD
9.96%
6M
9.00%
1Y
22.19%
3Y*
18.18%
5Y*
9.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDIFX vs. SWYMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TDIFX
Dimensional Retirement Income Fund
2.88%7.22%6.21%7.76%-9.37%14.53%9.33%9.96%-1.98%5.17%
SWYMX
Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund
9.96%19.42%14.24%20.92%-17.65%17.80%14.66%25.34%-7.58%20.48%

Correlation

The correlation between TDIFX and SWYMX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2016

0.73

The correlation between TDIFX and SWYMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDIFX vs. SWYMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDIFX
TDIFX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
TDIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

SWYMX
SWYMX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SWYMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWYMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWYMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SWYMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWYMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDIFX vs. SWYMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Retirement Income Fund (TDIFX) and Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund (SWYMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TDIFXSWYMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.36

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

2.78

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.89

12.16

-0.26

TDIFX vs. SWYMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDIFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the SWYMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDIFX and SWYMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TDIFX vs. SWYMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDIFX drawdown since its inception was -12.21%, smaller than the maximum SWYMX drawdown of -30.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDIFX and SWYMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDIFXSWYMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.21%

-30.48%

+18.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.61%

-8.55%

+5.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.51%

-14.95%

+11.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.21%

-25.37%

+13.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.96%

-1.96%

+1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.74%

-4.49%

+2.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.59%

1.95%

-1.36%

Volatility

TDIFX vs. SWYMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional Retirement Income Fund (TDIFX) is 1.53%, while Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund (SWYMX) has a volatility of 4.79%. This indicates that TDIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWYMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDIFXSWYMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.53%

4.79%

-3.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.80%

9.86%

-7.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.59%

11.98%

-8.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.91%

14.83%

-8.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.07%

15.65%

-10.58%

TDIFX vs. SWYMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDIFX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than SWYMX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TDIFX vs. SWYMX - Dividend Comparison

TDIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, more than SWYMX's 1.82% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SWYMX
Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund
1.82%2.00%2.03%1.99%1.96%1.78%1.65%1.96%2.15%1.43%1.22%
TDIFX
Dimensional Retirement Income Fund
2.01%1.77%3.11%3.09%4.66%9.39%1.39%1.98%2.11%0.98%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDIFX and SWYMX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SWYMX has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to TDIFX (1.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDIFX dropped -12.21% vs SWYMX's -30.48%.

TDIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDIFX and SWYMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer