PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWYMX vs. VFIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWYMX vs. VFIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund (SWYMX) and Vanguard Target Retirement 2050 Fund (VFIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SWYMX having a 11.75% return and VFIFX slightly lower at 11.49%.


SWYMX

1D
1.04%
1M
1.63%
YTD
11.75%
6M
11.47%
1Y
26.72%
3Y*
17.93%
5Y*
10.24%
10Y*

VFIFX

1D
1.12%
1M
1.69%
YTD
11.49%
6M
11.33%
1Y
27.52%
3Y*
18.37%
5Y*
10.41%
10Y*
11.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWYMX vs. VFIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWYMX
Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund
11.75%19.42%14.24%20.92%-17.65%17.80%14.66%25.34%-7.58%20.48%
VFIFX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2050 Fund
11.49%21.42%14.45%20.39%-17.48%16.42%16.40%24.99%-7.89%19.15%

Correlation

The correlation between SWYMX and VFIFX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2016

0.98

The correlation between SWYMX and VFIFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWYMX vs. VFIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWYMX
SWYMX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SWYMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWYMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWYMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SWYMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWYMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

VFIFX
VFIFX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VFIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VFIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWYMX vs. VFIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund (SWYMX) and Vanguard Target Retirement 2050 Fund (VFIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWYMXVFIFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.41

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

3.06

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.51

13.25

+0.26

SWYMX vs. VFIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWYMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the VFIFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWYMX and VFIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWYMX vs. VFIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWYMX drawdown since its inception was -30.48%, smaller than the maximum VFIFX drawdown of -51.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWYMX and VFIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWYMXVFIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.48%

-51.68%

+21.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.55%

-8.87%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.95%

-14.54%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.37%

-25.40%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.51%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.49%

-6.87%

+2.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

2.04%

-0.09%

Volatility

SWYMX vs. VFIFX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund (SWYMX) and Vanguard Target Retirement 2050 Fund (VFIFX) have volatilities of 4.64% and 4.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWYMXVFIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.64%

4.86%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.77%

9.97%

-0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.87%

12.06%

-0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.82%

14.29%

+0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.64%

15.15%

+0.49%

SWYMX vs. VFIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWYMX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VFIFX's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SWYMX vs. VFIFX - Dividend Comparison

SWYMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than VFIFX's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SWYMX
Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund
1.79%2.00%2.03%1.99%1.96%1.78%1.65%1.96%2.15%1.43%1.22%0.00%
VFIFX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2050 Fund
1.87%2.09%2.26%2.21%2.38%12.83%1.84%2.20%2.51%0.03%2.04%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, SWYMX and VFIFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VFIFX has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to SWYMX (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWYMX dropped -30.48% vs VFIFX's -51.68%.

VFIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWYMX and VFIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer