TDIFX vs. FRQHX
Compare and contrast key facts about Dimensional Retirement Income Fund (TDIFX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX).
TDIFX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Nov 1, 2015. FRQHX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Aug 1, 2019.
Performance
TDIFX vs. FRQHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TDIFX vs. FRQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDIFX Dimensional Retirement Income Fund | 0.21% | 7.22% | 6.21% | 7.76% | -9.37% | 14.53% | 9.33% | 2.54% |
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 | 0.30% | 10.01% | 4.68% | 8.75% | -12.22% | 4.04% | 9.80% | 3.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDIFX achieves a 0.21% return, which is significantly lower than FRQHX's 0.30% return.
TDIFX
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- YTD
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 5.68%
- 3Y*
- 5.90%
- 5Y*
- 4.81%
- 10Y*
- 4.81%
FRQHX
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -2.05%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 1.41%
- 1Y
- 7.79%
- 3Y*
- 6.54%
- 5Y*
- 2.69%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TDIFX vs. FRQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDIFX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQHX's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
TDIFX vs. FRQHX — Risk / Return Rank
TDIFX
FRQHX
TDIFX vs. FRQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Retirement Income Fund (TDIFX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TDIFX | FRQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.47 | 1.76 | -0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.07 | 2.46 | -0.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.35 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | 2.40 | -0.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.12 | 9.49 | -3.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TDIFX | FRQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 1.76 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.49 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.00 | 0.72 | +0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between TDIFX and FRQHX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TDIFX vs. FRQHX - Dividend Comparison
TDIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than FRQHX's 3.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDIFX Dimensional Retirement Income Fund | 2.06% | 1.77% | 3.11% | 3.09% | 4.66% | 9.39% | 1.39% | 1.98% | 2.11% | 0.98% | 0.89% |
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 | 3.35% | 3.20% | 3.20% | 2.95% | 5.25% | 6.22% | 3.70% | 2.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TDIFX vs. FRQHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDIFX drawdown since its inception was -12.21%, smaller than the maximum FRQHX drawdown of -16.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDIFX and FRQHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDIFX | FRQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.21% | -16.90% | +4.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.84% | -3.41% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.21% | -16.90% | +4.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -12.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -2.44% | +0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.77% | -3.88% | +2.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.84% | 0.86% | -0.02% |
Volatility
TDIFX vs. FRQHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional Retirement Income Fund (TDIFX) is 1.51%, while Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) has a volatility of 2.11%. This indicates that TDIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRQHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TDIFX | FRQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.51% | 2.11% | -0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.32% | 2.93% | -0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.34% | 4.65% | -0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.89% | 5.52% | +0.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.05% | 5.77% | -0.72% |