TCV vs. FNK

Last updated Jul 30, 2026

TCV (Towle Value ETF) and FNK (First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. TCV is actively managed, while FNK is passively managed. Over the past year, TCV returned 33.14% vs 21.26% for FNK. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TCV charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FNK.

Performance

TCV vs. FNK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Towle Value ETF (TCV) and First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCV achieves a 27.04% return, which is significantly higher than FNK's 16.07% return.

TCV

• 1D: -1.38%
• 1M: 1.82%
• 6M: 15.50%
• YTD: 27.04%
• 1Y: 33.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 29.74%

FNK

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 4.13%
• 6M: 10.87%
• YTD: 16.07%
• 1Y: 21.26%
• 3Y*: 11.50%
• 5Y*: 9.35%
• 10Y*: 9.89%
• ALL TIME*: 9.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FNK First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund	$174.14K	$204.22K	$289.17K
TCV Towle Value ETF	$910.76K	$643.64K	$380.38K

TCV vs. FNK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TCV Towle Value ETF	27.04%	2.99%
FNK First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund	16.07%	6.77%

Correlation

The correlation between TCV and FNK is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2025	0.76

The correlation between TCV and FNK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TCV vs. FNK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TCV

TCV Risk / Return Rank: 74
TCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
TCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
TCV Omega Ratio Rank: 68
TCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
TCV Martin Ratio Rank: 74

FNK

FNK Risk / Return Rank: 65
FNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
FNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FNK Omega Ratio Rank: 62
FNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
FNK Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TCV vs. FNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Towle Value ETF (TCV) and First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TCV	FNK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	1.44	+0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.29	2.24	+0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.26	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.74	2.34	+0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.79	6.95	+1.83

TCV vs. FNK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCV Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the FNK Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCV and FNK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TCV vs. FNK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCV drawdown since its inception was -12.23%, smaller than the maximum FNK drawdown of -50.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCV and FNK.

Drawdown Indicators

	TCV	FNK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.23%	-50.70%	+38.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.13%	-9.13%	-3.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.16%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.16%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-50.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.57%	-0.18%	-2.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.23%	-6.78%	+3.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.90%	3.09%	+0.81%

Volatility

TCV vs. FNK - Volatility Comparison

Towle Value ETF (TCV) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK) at 3.72%. This indicates that TCV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TCV	FNK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.69%	3.72%	+0.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.66%	9.42%	+4.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.70%	14.79%	+5.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.07%	20.90%	+0.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.07%	23.76%	-2.69%

TCV vs. FNK - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCV has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FNK's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

TCV vs. FNK - Dividend Comparison

TCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than FNK's 1.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNK First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund	1.41%	1.53%	1.63%	1.76%	1.66%	1.27%	1.61%	1.82%	1.76%	1.40%	1.38%	1.45%
TCV Towle Value ETF	0.57%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TCV and FNK in my portfolio?

TCV and FNK have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TCV or FNK?

TCV has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to FNK (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCV dropped -12.23% vs FNK's -50.70%.

Which ETF is better, TCV or FNK?

On 1-year performance, TCV leads with 33.14% vs 21.26% for FNK. On fees, FNK is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, FNK has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TCV or FNK?

Over the 1-year period, TCV has performed better with a 33.14% return vs 21.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TCV or FNK?

FNK is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TCV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TCV or FNK?

FNK has the higher dividend yield at 1.41%, compared with 0.57% for TCV.

What is the main difference between TCV and FNK?

They also come from different issuers: Towle and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TCV and 0.70% for FNK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.