TCL-A.TO vs. CLS
TCL-A.TO (Transcontinental Inc) and CLS (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. TCL-A.TO operates in Packaging & Containers (Consumer Cyclical), while CLS operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 10 years, TCL-A.TO returned 10.92%/yr vs 45.52%/yr for CLS. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TCL-A.TO vs. CLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
TCL-A.TO is traded in CAD, while CLS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CLS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TCL-A.TO having a 45.94% return and CLS slightly lower at 45.87%. Over the past 10 years, TCL-A.TO has underperformed CLS with an annualized return of 10.92%, while CLS has yielded a comparatively higher 45.52% annualized return.
TCL-A.TO
- 1D
- -9.77%
- 1M
- -16.04%
- YTD
- 45.94%
- 6M
- 65.63%
- 1Y
- 59.25%
- 3Y*
- 41.15%
- 5Y*
- 15.10%
- 10Y*
- 10.92%
CLS
- 1D
- -7.06%
- 1M
- 4.02%
- YTD
- 45.87%
- 6M
- 31.33%
- 1Y
- 260.79%
- 3Y*
- 223.24%
- 5Y*
- 124.38%
- 10Y*
- 45.52%
TCL-A.TO vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCL-A.TO Transcontinental Inc | 45.94% | 35.45% | 43.88% | -4.15% | -20.69% | 3.26% | 37.35% | -13.30% | -19.77% | 14.61% |
CLS Celestica Inc. | 45.87% | 205.58% | 242.31% | 154.08% | 8.47% | 36.67% | -4.07% | -10.34% | -9.22% | -17.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between TCL-A.TO and CLS is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2009 | 0.24 |
Fundamentals
TCL-A.TO:
CA$393.76M
CLS:
$49.21B
TCL-A.TO:
CA$1.74
CLS:
$8.28
TCL-A.TO:
2.71
CLS:
51.34
TCL-A.TO:
0.19
CLS:
0.69
TCL-A.TO:
0.17
CLS:
3.57
TCL-A.TO:
0.21
CLS:
23.46
TCL-A.TO:
CA$2.36B
CLS:
$13.81B
TCL-A.TO:
CA$1.07B
CLS:
$1.60B
TCL-A.TO:
CA$362.30M
CLS:
$1.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCL-A.TO vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank
TCL-A.TO
CLS
TCL-A.TO vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transcontinental Inc (TCL-A.TO) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TCL-A.TO | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.44 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 8.21 | -5.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.68 | 20.79 | -12.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TCL-A.TO | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.12 | 3.71 | -2.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 2.23 | -1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.94 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.70 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
TCL-A.TO vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCL-A.TO drawdown since its inception was -78.84%, roughly equal to the maximum CLS drawdown of -79.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCL-A.TO and CLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCL-A.TO | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.84% | -79.25% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.41% | -31.99% | +9.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.03% | -54.22% | +25.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.10% | -54.22% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.34% | -79.25% | +11.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.41% | -9.50% | -12.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.27% | -22.37% | -1.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.84% | 12.61% | -5.77% |
Volatility
TCL-A.TO vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Transcontinental Inc (TCL-A.TO) is 11.14%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 23.61%. This indicates that TCL-A.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TCL-A.TO | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.14% | 23.61% | -12.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.54% | 52.94% | -7.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.42% | 70.76% | -17.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.08% | 56.20% | -21.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.49% | 48.45% | -13.96% |
Dividends
TCL-A.TO vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison
TCL-A.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 438.96%, while CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLS Celestica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TCL-A.TO Transcontinental Inc | 438.96% | 8.36% | 4.85% | 6.57% | 5.89% | 4.43% | 4.36% | 5.48% | 4.30% | 2.42% | 3.33% | 4.74% |
Financials
TCL-A.TO vs. CLS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Transcontinental Inc and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TCL-A.TO vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison
TCL-A.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Transcontinental Inc reported a gross profit of 15.20M and revenue of 263.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 5.8%.
CLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
TCL-A.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Transcontinental Inc reported an operating income of 15.20M and revenue of 263.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.8%.
CLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 272.10M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
TCL-A.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Transcontinental Inc reported a net income of 29.70M and revenue of 263.50M, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.
CLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TCL-A.TO and CLS have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for TCL-A.TO and CLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer