TCHP vs. TFLR

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR).

TCHP and TFLR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TCHP is an actively managed fund by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Aug 4, 2020. TFLR is an actively managed fund by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Nov 16, 2022.

Performance

TCHP vs. TFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TCHP vs. TFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
TCHP T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF	-10.79%	18.40%	36.06%	50.10%	-4.49%
TFLR T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF	-0.33%	6.57%	8.77%	12.05%	-0.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCHP achieves a -10.79% return, which is significantly lower than TFLR's -0.33% return.

TCHP

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: -4.84%
• YTD: -10.79%
• 6M: -9.58%
• 1Y: 15.68%
• 3Y*: 22.87%
• 5Y*: 9.20%
• 10Y*: —

TFLR

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.99%
• YTD: -0.33%
• 6M: 1.26%
• 1Y: 5.91%
• 3Y*: 7.90%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCHP vs. TFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCHP has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than TFLR's 0.60% expense ratio.

TFLR

T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF

TCHP

T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF

Return for Risk

TCHP vs. TFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCHP

TCHP Risk / Return Rank: 36
TCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
TCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
TCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 38
TCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
TCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 35

TFLR

TFLR Risk / Return Rank: 69
TFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
TFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
TFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 92
TFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
TFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCHP vs. TFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TCHP	TFLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.68	1.09	-0.40
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.15	1.47	-0.32
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.41	-0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.96	1.65	-0.69
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.29	8.96	-5.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TCHP vs. TFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCHP Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the TFLR Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCHP and TFLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TCHP	TFLR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68	1.09	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	2.11	-1.66

Correlation

The correlation between TCHP and TFLR is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

TCHP vs. TFLR - Dividend Comparison

TCHP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.94%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TCHP T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%
TFLR T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF	6.94%	6.93%	8.18%	7.76%	0.58%	0.00%

Drawdowns

TCHP vs. TFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCHP drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, which is greater than TFLR's maximum drawdown of -4.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCHP and TFLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	TCHP	TFLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.34%	-4.01%	-38.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.50%	-3.50%	-14.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.51%	-0.83%	-12.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.71%	-0.22%	-11.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.10%	0.64%	+4.46%

Volatility

TCHP vs. TFLR - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) has a higher volatility of 7.12% compared to T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR) at 0.89%. This indicates that TCHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TCHP	TFLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.12%	0.89%	+6.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.00%	1.65%	+11.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.06%	5.47%	+17.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.44%	3.74%	+19.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.37%	3.74%	+19.63%