PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFLR vs. JPLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TFLR vs. JPLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR) and JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFLR achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly higher than JPLD's 1.02% return.


TFLR

1D
0.10%
1M
0.10%
YTD
1.41%
6M
1.66%
1Y
5.50%
3Y*
7.80%
5Y*
10Y*

JPLD

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.26%
YTD
1.02%
6M
1.23%
1Y
4.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFLR vs. JPLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TFLR
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF
1.41%6.57%8.77%4.69%
JPLD
JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF
1.02%6.01%6.49%3.15%

Correlation

The correlation between TFLR and JPLD is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2023

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TFLR vs. JPLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFLR
TFLR Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
TFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
TFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

JPLD
JPLD Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
JPLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
JPLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFLR vs. JPLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR) and JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TFLRJPLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.60

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

4.27

-1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.58

19.49

-7.91

TFLR vs. JPLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFLR Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the JPLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFLR and JPLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TFLR vs. JPLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFLR drawdown since its inception was -4.01%, which is greater than JPLD's maximum drawdown of -1.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFLR and JPLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFLRJPLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.01%

-1.17%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.18%

-1.00%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-0.34%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.22%

-0.15%

-0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

0.22%

+0.26%

Volatility

TFLR vs. JPLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR) is 0.37%, while JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD) has a volatility of 0.53%. This indicates that TFLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFLRJPLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.37%

0.53%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.74%

1.05%

+0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98%

1.48%

+0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.66%

1.84%

+1.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.66%

1.84%

+1.82%

TFLR vs. JPLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFLR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than JPLD's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

TFLR vs. JPLD - Dividend Comparison

TFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.76%, more than JPLD's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
JPLD
JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF
4.21%4.24%4.47%1.83%0.00%
TFLR
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF
6.76%6.93%8.18%7.76%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


TFLR and JPLD have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JPLD has higher volatility (0.53%) compared to TFLR (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFLR dropped -4.01% vs JPLD's -1.17%.

On 1-year performance, TFLR leads with 5.50% vs 4.27% for JPLD. On fees, JPLD is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, TFLR has been the lower-risk option at 0.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TFLR has performed better with a 5.50% return vs 4.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JPLD is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for TFLR.

TFLR has the higher dividend yield at 6.76%, compared with 4.21% for JPLD.

TFLR is categorized as Bank Loan, while JPLD is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for TFLR and 0.24% for JPLD.

JPLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TFLR and JPLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer