TFLR vs. JPLD

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

TFLR (T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF) and JPLD (JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TFLR is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while JPLD is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TFLR returned 7.41%/yr vs 5.75%/yr for JPLD. Their 0.04 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TFLR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for JPLD.

Performance

TFLR vs. JPLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR) and JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFLR achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly higher than JPLD's 1.57% return.

TFLR

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.68%
• 6M: 2.03%
• YTD: 1.99%
• 1Y: 4.96%
• 3Y*: 7.41%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.77%

JPLD

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.15%
• 6M: 0.97%
• YTD: 1.57%
• 1Y: 3.80%
• 3Y*: 5.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
JPLD JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF	$14.99M	$21.36M	$24.34M
TFLR T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF	$4.35M	$3.87M	$3.99M

TFLR vs. JPLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TFLR T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF	1.99%	6.57%	8.77%	4.69%
JPLD JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF	1.57%	6.01%	6.49%	3.15%

Correlation

The correlation between TFLR and JPLD is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.02
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2023	0.04

Return for Risk

TFLR vs. JPLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TFLR

TFLR Risk / Return Rank: 85
TFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
TFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
TFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 95
TFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
TFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 79

JPLD

JPLD Risk / Return Rank: 94
JPLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
JPLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
JPLD Omega Ratio Rank: 95
JPLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
JPLD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TFLR vs. JPLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR) and JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TFLR	JPLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	2.78	-0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.56	4.26	-0.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.57	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.22	4.12	-1.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.10	18.72	-8.63

TFLR vs. JPLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFLR Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the JPLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFLR and JPLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TFLR vs. JPLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFLR drawdown since its inception was -4.01%, which is greater than JPLD's maximum drawdown of -1.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFLR and JPLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	TFLR	JPLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.01%	-1.17%	-2.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.18%	-1.00%	-1.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.01%	-1.17%	-2.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.06%	0.00%	-0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.21%	-0.15%	-0.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.48%	0.22%	+0.26%

Volatility

TFLR vs. JPLD - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR) has a higher volatility of 0.48% compared to JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD) at 0.36%. This indicates that TFLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TFLR	JPLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.48%	0.36%	+0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.77%	1.09%	+0.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.01%	1.49%	+0.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.61%	1.82%	+1.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.61%	1.82%	+1.79%

TFLR vs. JPLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFLR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than JPLD's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

TFLR vs. JPLD - Dividend Comparison

TFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.67%, more than JPLD's 4.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
JPLD JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF	3.91%	4.24%	4.47%	1.83%	0.00%
TFLR T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF	6.67%	6.93%	8.18%	7.76%	0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TFLR and JPLD in my portfolio?

TFLR and JPLD have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TFLR or JPLD?

TFLR has higher volatility (0.48%) compared to JPLD (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFLR dropped -4.01% vs JPLD's -1.17%.

Which ETF is better, TFLR or JPLD?

On 3-year performance, TFLR leads with 7.41% vs 5.75% for JPLD. On fees, JPLD is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, JPLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TFLR or JPLD?

Over the 3-year period, TFLR has performed better with a 7.41% return vs 5.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TFLR or JPLD?

JPLD is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for TFLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TFLR or JPLD?

TFLR has the higher dividend yield at 6.67%, compared with 3.91% for JPLD.

What is the main difference between TFLR and JPLD?

TFLR is categorized as Bank Loan, while JPLD is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for TFLR and 0.24% for JPLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JPLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.