PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCHP vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TCHP vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCHP achieves a 3.99% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 30.35% return.


TCHP

1D
-1.29%
1M
3.68%
YTD
3.99%
6M
4.18%
1Y
20.05%
3Y*
24.50%
5Y*
11.66%
10Y*

SPMO

1D
0.50%
1M
15.36%
YTD
30.35%
6M
30.51%
1Y
46.00%
3Y*
43.04%
5Y*
24.29%
10Y*
20.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCHP vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TCHP
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF
3.99%18.40%36.06%50.10%-37.81%18.08%11.37%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
30.35%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%10.98%

Correlation

The correlation between TCHP and SPMO is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2020

0.81

The correlation between TCHP and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

TCHP vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TCHP
SPMO

Technology

47.9%
52.6%

Consumer Cyclical

16.2%
1.3%

Communication Services

15.7%
9.2%

Financial Services

8.0%
5.9%

Healthcare

6.6%
6.7%

Industrials

3.6%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%
4.3%

Basic Materials

0.8%
1.6%

Utilities

0.5%
2.8%

Energy

-

3.4%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Technology

TCHP
47.9%
SPMO
52.6%

Consumer Cyclical

TCHP
16.2%
SPMO
1.3%

Communication Services

TCHP
15.7%
SPMO
9.2%

Financial Services

TCHP
8.0%
SPMO
5.9%

Healthcare

TCHP
6.6%
SPMO
6.7%

Industrials

TCHP
3.6%
SPMO
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

TCHP
0.8%
SPMO
4.3%

Basic Materials

TCHP
0.8%
SPMO
1.6%

Utilities

TCHP
0.5%
SPMO
2.8%

Energy

TCHP

-

SPMO
3.4%

Real Estate

TCHP

-

SPMO
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCHP vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCHP
TCHP Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
TCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
TCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCHP vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TCHPSPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.47

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

3.64

-2.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.84

14.17

-10.32

TCHP vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCHP Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCHP and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TCHPSPMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

2.62

-1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

1.27

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

1.01

-0.44

Drawdowns

TCHP vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCHP drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCHP and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCHPSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.34%

-30.95%

-11.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.50%

-12.70%

-4.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.92%

-20.13%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.34%

-22.74%

-19.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.21%

0.00%

-2.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.47%

-4.60%

-6.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.23%

3.26%

+1.97%

Volatility

TCHP vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) is 3.84%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that TCHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCHPSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

7.35%

-3.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.20%

14.39%

-2.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.12%

17.64%

-1.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.43%

19.30%

+4.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.18%

20.31%

+2.87%

TCHP vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCHP has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

TCHP vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

TCHP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.65%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%
TCHP
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TCHP and SPMO have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to TCHP (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCHP dropped -42.34% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

On 5-year performance, SPMO leads with 24.29% vs 11.66% for TCHP. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, TCHP has been the lower-risk option at 3.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 24.29% return vs 11.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for TCHP.

SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.00% for TCHP.

TCHP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for TCHP and 0.13% for SPMO.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCHP and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer