TCHP vs. SPMO
TCHP (T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TCHP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. TCHP is actively managed, while SPMO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TCHP returned 11.66%/yr vs 24.29%/yr for SPMO. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TCHP charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
TCHP vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TCHP achieves a 3.99% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 30.35% return.
TCHP
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 3.68%
- YTD
- 3.99%
- 6M
- 4.18%
- 1Y
- 20.05%
- 3Y*
- 24.50%
- 5Y*
- 11.66%
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 15.36%
- YTD
- 30.35%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 46.00%
- 3Y*
- 43.04%
- 5Y*
- 24.29%
- 10Y*
- 20.95%
TCHP vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCHP T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF | 3.99% | 18.40% | 36.06% | 50.10% | -37.81% | 18.08% | 11.37% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 30.35% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 10.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between TCHP and SPMO is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2020 | 0.81 |
The correlation between TCHP and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
TCHP vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TCHP
SPMO
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
TCHP
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
TCHP
SPMO
Communication Services
TCHP
SPMO
Financial Services
TCHP
SPMO
Healthcare
TCHP
SPMO
Industrials
TCHP
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
TCHP
SPMO
Basic Materials
TCHP
SPMO
Utilities
TCHP
SPMO
Energy
TCHP
-
SPMO
Real Estate
TCHP
-
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCHP vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
TCHP
SPMO
TCHP vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TCHP | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.47 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 3.64 | -2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.84 | 14.17 | -10.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TCHP | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 2.62 | -1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 1.27 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 1.01 | -0.44 |
Drawdowns
TCHP vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCHP drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCHP and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCHP | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.34% | -30.95% | -11.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.50% | -12.70% | -4.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.92% | -20.13% | -2.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.34% | -22.74% | -19.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.21% | 0.00% | -2.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.47% | -4.60% | -6.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.23% | 3.26% | +1.97% |
Volatility
TCHP vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) is 3.84%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that TCHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TCHP | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.84% | 7.35% | -3.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.20% | 14.39% | -2.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.12% | 17.64% | -1.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.43% | 19.30% | +4.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.18% | 20.31% | +2.87% |
TCHP vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TCHP has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
TCHP vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
TCHP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.65% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
TCHP T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TCHP and SPMO have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to TCHP (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCHP dropped -42.34% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 5-year performance, SPMO leads with 24.29% vs 11.66% for TCHP. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, TCHP has been the lower-risk option at 3.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 24.29% return vs 11.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for TCHP.
SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.00% for TCHP.
TCHP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for TCHP and 0.13% for SPMO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TCHP and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer