TCAL vs. TGRW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TCAL (T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF) and TGRW (T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TCAL is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while TGRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TCAL returned -1.87% vs 21.56% for TGRW. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TCAL charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for TGRW.

Performance

TCAL vs. TGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL) and T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCAL achieves a -2.88% return, which is significantly lower than TGRW's 5.83% return.

TCAL

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: -1.26%
• YTD: -2.88%
• 6M: -2.97%
• 1Y: -1.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TGRW

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: 6.14%
• YTD: 5.83%
• 6M: 5.32%
• 1Y: 21.56%
• 3Y*: 22.38%
• 5Y*: 9.69%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCAL vs. TGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TCAL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF	-2.88%	1.58%
TGRW T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF	5.83%	24.45%

Correlation

The correlation between TCAL and TGRW is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025	0.15

TCAL vs. TGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TCAL	TGRW
Industrials	19.3%	4.6%
Healthcare	18.7%	7.4%
Financial Services	15.0%	5.6%
Consumer Defensive	11.3%	0.9%
Technology	11.3%	52.0%
Utilities	9.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.7%	12.5%
Real Estate	2.2%	0.6%
Basic Materials	1.7%	0.7%
Energy	1.3%	-
Communication Services	0.9%	15.6%

Return for Risk

TCAL vs. TGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCAL

TCAL Risk / Return Rank: 6
TCAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
TCAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
TCAL Omega Ratio Rank: 6
TCAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
TCAL Martin Ratio Rank: 5

TGRW

TGRW Risk / Return Rank: 31
TGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
TGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
TGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 34
TGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
TGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCAL vs. TGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL) and T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TCAL	TGRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.20	1.31	-1.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.22	1.84	-2.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.23	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.27	1.15	-1.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.70	3.64	-4.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TCAL vs. TGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCAL Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the TGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCAL and TGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TCAL	TGRW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.20	1.31	-1.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.10	0.53	-0.63

Drawdowns

TCAL vs. TGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCAL drawdown since its inception was -7.24%, smaller than the maximum TGRW drawdown of -43.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCAL and TGRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	TCAL	TGRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.24%	-43.33%	+36.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.00%	-18.84%	+11.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.18%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.92%	-1.79%	-4.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.02%	-12.48%	+10.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.67%	5.94%	-3.27%

Volatility

TCAL vs. TGRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL) is 2.46%, while T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW) has a volatility of 3.91%. This indicates that TCAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TCAL	TGRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.46%	3.91%	-1.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.08%	12.54%	-5.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.31%	16.57%	-7.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.25%	23.27%	-12.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.25%	23.02%	-11.77%

TCAL vs. TGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCAL has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than TGRW's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

TCAL vs. TGRW - Dividend Comparison

TCAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.96%, while TGRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
TCAL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF	11.96%	8.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TGRW T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.00%	0.40%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TCAL and TGRW in my portfolio?

TCAL and TGRW have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TCAL or TGRW?

TGRW has higher volatility (3.91%) compared to TCAL (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCAL dropped -7.24% vs TGRW's -43.33%.

Which ETF is better, TCAL or TGRW?

On 1-year performance, TGRW leads with 21.56% vs -1.87% for TCAL. On fees, TCAL is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, TCAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TCAL or TGRW?

Over the 1-year period, TGRW has performed better with a 21.56% return vs -1.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TCAL or TGRW?

TCAL is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for TGRW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TCAL or TGRW?

TCAL has the higher dividend yield at 11.96%, compared with 0.00% for TGRW.

What is the main difference between TCAL and TGRW?

TCAL is categorized as Derivative Income, while TGRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for TCAL and 0.52% for TGRW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.