PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCAAX vs. RPFCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TCAAX vs. RPFCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Moderately Conservative Allocation Fund (TCAAX) and Davis Appreciation & Income Fund (RPFCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCAAX achieves a 4.34% return, which is significantly lower than RPFCX's 14.17% return. Over the past 10 years, TCAAX has underperformed RPFCX with an annualized return of 5.25%, while RPFCX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.69% annualized return.


TCAAX

1D
0.87%
1M
-0.50%
6M
3.04%
YTD
4.34%
1Y
10.42%
3Y*
9.33%
5Y*
3.98%
10Y*
5.25%
ALL TIME*
4.64%

RPFCX

1D
0.24%
1M
1.63%
6M
11.35%
YTD
14.17%
1Y
29.00%
3Y*
16.53%
5Y*
10.09%
10Y*
10.69%
ALL TIME*
8.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TCAAX vs. RPFCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TCAAX
Thrivent Moderately Conservative Allocation Fund
4.34%11.66%8.27%11.69%-14.96%6.52%10.12%14.81%-3.89%7.26%
RPFCX
Davis Appreciation & Income Fund
14.17%20.90%9.10%23.00%-15.65%25.74%4.74%20.33%-8.02%16.35%

Correlation

The correlation between TCAAX and RPFCX is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006

0.84

The correlation between TCAAX and RPFCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCAAX vs. RPFCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TCAAX
TCAAX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
TCAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
TCAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

RPFCX
RPFCX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
RPFCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPFCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPFCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
RPFCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPFCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TCAAX vs. RPFCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Moderately Conservative Allocation Fund (TCAAX) and Davis Appreciation & Income Fund (RPFCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TCAAXRPFCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.54

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

3.99

-2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.46

15.92

-7.46

TCAAX vs. RPFCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCAAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the RPFCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCAAX and RPFCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TCAAX vs. RPFCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCAAX drawdown since its inception was -30.82%, smaller than the maximum RPFCX drawdown of -56.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCAAX and RPFCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCAAXRPFCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.82%

-56.39%

+25.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.04%

-6.76%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.47%

-14.82%

+7.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.33%

-25.63%

+5.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.33%

-30.72%

+10.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-0.39%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.78%

-7.40%

+3.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.18%

1.70%

-0.52%

Volatility

TCAAX vs. RPFCX - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Moderately Conservative Allocation Fund (TCAAX) and Davis Appreciation & Income Fund (RPFCX) have volatilities of 1.92% and 2.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCAAXRPFCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.92%

2.02%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.59%

6.74%

-1.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.73%

9.05%

-2.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.11%

14.04%

-5.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.22%

14.75%

-7.53%

TCAAX vs. RPFCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCAAX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than RPFCX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

TCAAX vs. RPFCX - Dividend Comparison

TCAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.06%, more than RPFCX's 5.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RPFCX
Davis Appreciation & Income Fund
5.67%6.09%1.11%2.91%2.63%0.28%0.78%2.03%1.09%0.83%1.09%1.19%
TCAAX
Thrivent Moderately Conservative Allocation Fund
6.06%6.19%3.55%2.52%1.87%3.74%3.82%5.15%3.99%1.77%1.67%1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


TCAAX and RPFCX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RPFCX has higher volatility (2.02%) compared to TCAAX (1.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCAAX dropped -30.82% vs RPFCX's -56.39%.

RPFCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCAAX and RPFCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer