PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPFCX vs. DGFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPFCX vs. DGFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Davis Appreciation & Income Fund (RPFCX) and Davis Global Fund (DGFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPFCX achieves a 7.72% return, which is significantly higher than DGFAX's 3.97% return. Over the past 10 years, RPFCX has underperformed DGFAX with an annualized return of 10.17%, while DGFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.01% annualized return.


RPFCX

1D
0.42%
1M
1.14%
YTD
7.72%
6M
9.18%
1Y
23.75%
3Y*
17.12%
5Y*
8.87%
10Y*
10.17%

DGFAX

1D
0.52%
1M
4.38%
YTD
3.97%
6M
7.20%
1Y
25.38%
3Y*
21.59%
5Y*
6.45%
10Y*
11.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPFCX vs. DGFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RPFCX
Davis Appreciation & Income Fund
7.72%20.90%9.10%23.00%-15.65%25.74%4.74%20.33%-8.02%16.35%
DGFAX
Davis Global Fund
3.97%31.85%22.59%17.22%-16.53%-5.15%23.06%31.61%-20.73%33.33%

Correlation

The correlation between RPFCX and DGFAX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2004

0.79

The correlation between RPFCX and DGFAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.82 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPFCX vs. DGFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPFCX
RPFCX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
RPFCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPFCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPFCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
RPFCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPFCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

DGFAX
DGFAX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
DGFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
DGFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPFCX vs. DGFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis Appreciation & Income Fund (RPFCX) and Davis Global Fund (DGFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RPFCXDGFAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.68

1.77

+0.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.87

2.41

+1.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.33

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

1.99

+1.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.82

6.74

+7.08

RPFCX vs. DGFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPFCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is higher than the DGFAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPFCX and DGFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RPFCXDGFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68

1.77

+0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.32

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.55

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.43

+0.15

Drawdowns

RPFCX vs. DGFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPFCX drawdown since its inception was -56.39%, smaller than the maximum DGFAX drawdown of -65.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPFCX and DGFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPFCXDGFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.39%

-65.64%

+9.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.76%

-12.72%

+5.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.82%

-16.92%

+2.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.63%

-40.84%

+15.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.72%

-42.47%

+11.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

0.00%

-1.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.43%

-14.69%

+7.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

3.75%

-2.01%

Volatility

RPFCX vs. DGFAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Davis Appreciation & Income Fund (RPFCX) is 2.29%, while Davis Global Fund (DGFAX) has a volatility of 4.26%. This indicates that RPFCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPFCXDGFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.29%

4.26%

-1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.59%

10.67%

-4.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.01%

14.35%

-5.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.10%

20.49%

-6.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.78%

19.98%

-5.20%

RPFCX vs. DGFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPFCX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than DGFAX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

RPFCX vs. DGFAX - Dividend Comparison

RPFCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, less than DGFAX's 7.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGFAX
Davis Global Fund
7.54%7.83%13.06%1.07%0.00%11.55%0.27%1.88%9.25%0.00%0.00%6.12%
RPFCX
Davis Appreciation & Income Fund
5.99%6.09%1.11%2.91%2.63%0.28%0.78%2.03%1.09%0.83%1.09%1.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


RPFCX and DGFAX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGFAX has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to RPFCX (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPFCX dropped -56.39% vs DGFAX's -65.64%.

RPFCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPFCX and DGFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer