PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPFCX vs. RPFRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPFCX vs. RPFRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Davis Appreciation & Income Fund (RPFCX) and Davis Real Estate Fund (RPFRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPFCX achieves a 7.27% return, which is significantly higher than RPFRX's 6.57% return. Over the past 10 years, RPFCX has outperformed RPFRX with an annualized return of 10.12%, while RPFRX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.70% annualized return.


RPFCX

1D
-0.61%
1M
0.49%
YTD
7.27%
6M
9.12%
1Y
23.51%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*
10.12%

RPFRX

1D
-1.31%
1M
0.28%
YTD
6.57%
6M
5.49%
1Y
3.22%
3Y*
4.34%
5Y*
-0.81%
10Y*
3.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPFCX vs. RPFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RPFCX
Davis Appreciation & Income Fund
7.27%20.90%9.10%23.00%-15.65%25.74%4.74%20.33%-8.02%16.35%
RPFRX
Davis Real Estate Fund
6.57%-6.17%2.30%10.48%-26.78%43.26%-8.25%25.39%-4.52%8.32%

Correlation

The correlation between RPFCX and RPFRX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1994

0.64

The correlation between RPFCX and RPFRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (10 years) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPFCX vs. RPFRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPFCX
RPFCX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
RPFCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPFCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPFCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
RPFCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPFCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

RPFRX
RPFRX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
RPFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
RPFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPFCX vs. RPFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis Appreciation & Income Fund (RPFCX) and Davis Real Estate Fund (RPFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RPFCXRPFRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.67

0.23

+2.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.85

0.41

+3.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.05

+0.43

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

0.30

+3.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.70

0.72

+12.99

RPFCX vs. RPFRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPFCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is higher than the RPFRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPFCX and RPFRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RPFCXRPFRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

0.23

+2.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

-0.04

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.18

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.37

+0.21

Drawdowns

RPFCX vs. RPFRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPFCX drawdown since its inception was -56.39%, smaller than the maximum RPFRX drawdown of -75.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPFCX and RPFRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPFCXRPFRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.39%

-75.01%

+18.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.76%

-10.13%

+3.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.82%

-22.20%

+7.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.63%

-35.52%

+9.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.72%

-42.29%

+11.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-17.36%

+15.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.43%

-13.41%

+5.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

4.18%

-2.44%

Volatility

RPFCX vs. RPFRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Davis Appreciation & Income Fund (RPFCX) is 2.29%, while Davis Real Estate Fund (RPFRX) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that RPFCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RPFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPFCXRPFRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.29%

4.32%

-2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.59%

10.05%

-3.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.02%

14.29%

-5.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.10%

19.50%

-5.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.78%

21.12%

-6.34%

RPFCX vs. RPFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPFCX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than RPFRX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

RPFCX vs. RPFRX - Dividend Comparison

RPFCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.02%, less than RPFRX's 6.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RPFCX
Davis Appreciation & Income Fund
6.02%6.09%1.11%2.91%2.63%0.28%0.78%2.03%1.09%0.83%1.09%1.19%
RPFRX
Davis Real Estate Fund
6.76%6.48%1.43%2.26%5.33%1.05%1.77%2.78%6.03%5.84%1.61%1.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


RPFCX and RPFRX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RPFRX has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to RPFCX (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPFCX dropped -56.39% vs RPFRX's -75.01%.

RPFCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPFCX and RPFRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer