TBX vs. CEF
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury (TBX) and Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF).
TBX is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA US Treasury (7-10 Y) (-100%). It was launched on Apr 4, 2011. CEF is an actively managed fund by Sprott. It was launched on Jan 16, 2018.
Performance
TBX vs. CEF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TBX vs. CEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBX ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury | 1.57% | -1.15% | 8.52% | 3.99% | 18.31% | 1.70% | -9.96% | -5.20% | 1.25% | -2.61% |
CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | 5.55% | 92.76% | 24.07% | 6.80% | 1.07% | -8.32% | 31.99% | 16.91% | -6.34% | 18.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TBX achieves a 1.57% return, which is significantly lower than CEF's 5.55% return. Over the past 10 years, TBX has underperformed CEF with an annualized return of 1.73%, while CEF has yielded a comparatively higher 15.18% annualized return.
TBX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- 1.57%
- 6M
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 4.06%
- 3Y*
- 5.11%
- 5Y*
- 5.34%
- 10Y*
- 1.73%
CEF
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- -13.66%
- YTD
- 5.55%
- 6M
- 30.90%
- 1Y
- 71.30%
- 3Y*
- 36.73%
- 5Y*
- 22.27%
- 10Y*
- 15.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TBX vs. CEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
TBX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CEF's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TBX vs. CEF — Risk / Return Rank
TBX
CEF
TBX vs. CEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury (TBX) and Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TBX | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.48 | 1.92 | -1.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.75 | 2.19 | -1.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.35 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 2.62 | -2.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.60 | 9.59 | -8.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TBX | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 | 1.92 | -1.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.94 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 0.71 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.17 | 0.23 | -0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between TBX and CEF is -0.21. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
TBX vs. CEF - Dividend Comparison
TBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, while CEF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBX ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury | 3.09% | 3.45% | 6.58% | 4.07% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 1.53% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.09% | 0.10% |
Drawdowns
TBX vs. CEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TBX drawdown since its inception was -41.04%, smaller than the maximum CEF drawdown of -62.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBX and CEF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TBX | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.04% | -62.29% | +21.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.77% | -26.77% | +20.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.77% | -26.77% | +19.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.46% | -29.10% | +9.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.30% | -18.36% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.74% | -27.38% | +0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.84% | 7.31% | -2.47% |
Volatility
TBX vs. CEF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury (TBX) is 1.92%, while Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF) has a volatility of 13.56%. This indicates that TBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TBX | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.92% | 13.56% | -11.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.22% | 35.38% | -32.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.65% | 37.38% | -28.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.43% | 23.78% | -15.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.14% | 21.58% | -14.44% |