PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBX vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TBX vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury (TBX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBX achieves a 3.19% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 7.60% return. Over the past 10 years, TBX has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 2.09%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.71% annualized return.


TBX

1D
-0.09%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
3.19%
6M
3.25%
1Y
2.94%
3Y*
4.61%
5Y*
6.08%
10Y*
2.09%

^GSPC

1D
-1.44%
1M
-1.45%
YTD
7.60%
6M
6.59%
1Y
22.24%
3Y*
19.20%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*
13.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBX vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TBX
ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury
3.19%-1.15%8.52%3.99%18.31%1.70%-9.96%-5.20%1.25%-2.61%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
7.60%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between TBX and ^GSPC is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2011

0.17

The correlation between TBX and ^GSPC shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBX vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBX
TBX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
TBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBX vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury (TBX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TBX^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.32

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

2.46

-1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.92

10.92

-8.99

TBX vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBX and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TBX vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBX drawdown since its inception was -41.04%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBX and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBX^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.04%

-56.78%

+15.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.08%

-9.10%

+6.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.77%

-18.90%

+11.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.77%

-25.43%

+17.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.46%

-33.92%

+14.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.00%

-3.21%

-13.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.60%

-10.71%

-15.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

2.04%

-0.51%

Volatility

TBX vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury (TBX) is 1.42%, while S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that TBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBX^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

4.89%

-3.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.51%

9.93%

-6.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.75%

12.57%

-7.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.44%

17.00%

-8.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.13%

18.08%

-10.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


TBX and ^GSPC have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

^GSPC has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to TBX (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBX dropped -41.04% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBX and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer