PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBLGX vs. FCQTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TBLGX vs. FCQTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2030 Fund (TBLGX) and American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund (FCQTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TBLGX vs. FCQTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TBLGX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2030 Fund
-0.79%15.49%11.32%16.91%-16.41%2.96%
FCQTX
American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund
-3.37%20.74%15.64%21.56%-19.63%4.72%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBLGX achieves a -0.79% return, which is significantly higher than FCQTX's -3.37% return.


TBLGX

1D
1.88%
1M
-4.45%
YTD
-0.79%
6M
1.29%
1Y
13.58%
3Y*
12.15%
5Y*
10Y*

FCQTX

1D
2.74%
1M
-6.47%
YTD
-3.37%
6M
-0.75%
1Y
18.43%
3Y*
15.53%
5Y*
7.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TBLGX vs. FCQTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBLGX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than FCQTX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

TBLGX vs. FCQTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBLGX
TBLGX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
TBLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
TBLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

FCQTX
FCQTX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FCQTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCQTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCQTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FCQTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCQTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBLGX vs. FCQTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2030 Fund (TBLGX) and American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund (FCQTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TBLGXFCQTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.27

1.24

+0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.82

1.85

-0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.26

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

1.85

-0.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.81

7.89

-0.08

TBLGX vs. FCQTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBLGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the FCQTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBLGX and FCQTX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBLGXFCQTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

1.24

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.98

-0.49

Correlation

The correlation between TBLGX and FCQTX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TBLGX vs. FCQTX - Dividend Comparison

TBLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than FCQTX's 4.83% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
TBLGX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2030 Fund
2.90%2.87%2.48%2.21%2.60%1.88%0.00%
FCQTX
American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund
4.83%4.67%2.80%1.99%3.96%1.54%0.72%

Drawdowns

TBLGX vs. FCQTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBLGX drawdown since its inception was -23.25%, smaller than the maximum FCQTX drawdown of -27.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLGX and FCQTX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TBLGXFCQTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.25%

-27.34%

+4.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.22%

-10.21%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.93%

-7.36%

+2.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

-6.02%

-0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

2.39%

-0.59%

Volatility

TBLGX vs. FCQTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2030 Fund (TBLGX) is 4.12%, while American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund (FCQTX) has a volatility of 5.61%. This indicates that TBLGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCQTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TBLGXFCQTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

5.61%

-1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.49%

9.44%

-2.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.01%

15.36%

-4.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.45%

14.63%

-3.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.45%

15.09%

-3.64%