PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBLGX vs. FOTKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBLGX vs. FOTKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2030 Fund (TBLGX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6 (FOTKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBLGX achieves a 7.94% return, which is significantly higher than FOTKX's 5.15% return.


TBLGX

1D
0.08%
1M
2.74%
YTD
7.94%
6M
8.88%
1Y
19.51%
3Y*
14.65%
5Y*
10Y*

FOTKX

1D
0.07%
1M
1.42%
YTD
5.15%
6M
5.81%
1Y
12.73%
3Y*
9.23%
5Y*
3.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBLGX vs. FOTKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TBLGX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2030 Fund
7.94%15.49%11.32%16.91%-16.41%2.96%
FOTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6
5.15%11.66%5.55%9.97%-13.05%0.68%

Correlation

The correlation between TBLGX and FOTKX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2021

0.85

The correlation between TBLGX and FOTKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBLGX vs. FOTKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBLGX
TBLGX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
TBLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
TBLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

FOTKX
FOTKX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FOTKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOTKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOTKX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FOTKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOTKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBLGX vs. FOTKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2030 Fund (TBLGX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6 (FOTKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TBLGXFOTKXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.41

2.61

-0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.43

3.82

-0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.54

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

3.28

-0.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.37

14.52

-1.15

TBLGX vs. FOTKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBLGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the FOTKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBLGX and FOTKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBLGXFOTKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

2.61

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.86

-0.23

Drawdowns

TBLGX vs. FOTKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBLGX drawdown since its inception was -23.25%, which is greater than FOTKX's maximum drawdown of -18.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLGX and FOTKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBLGXFOTKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.25%

-18.29%

-4.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.69%

-4.03%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.81%

-5.71%

-5.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.85%

-3.56%

-2.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.49%

0.91%

+0.58%

Volatility

TBLGX vs. FOTKX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2030 Fund (TBLGX) has a higher volatility of 2.59% compared to Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6 (FOTKX) at 1.93%. This indicates that TBLGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FOTKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBLGXFOTKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

1.93%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.68%

4.14%

+2.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.33%

4.92%

+3.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.39%

6.38%

+5.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.39%

6.42%

+4.97%

TBLGX vs. FOTKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBLGX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than FOTKX's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

TBLGX vs. FOTKX - Dividend Comparison

TBLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, less than FOTKX's 4.92% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FOTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6
4.92%5.25%3.32%2.98%7.41%9.53%6.17%6.00%7.24%3.57%
TBLGX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2030 Fund
2.66%2.87%2.48%2.21%2.60%1.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TBLGX and FOTKX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TBLGX has higher volatility (2.59%) compared to FOTKX (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLGX dropped -23.25% vs FOTKX's -18.29%.

FOTKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBLGX and FOTKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer