PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBLGX vs. PRUIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBLGX vs. PRUIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2030 Fund (TBLGX) and T. Rowe Price Equity Index 500 Fund - I Class (PRUIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBLGX achieves a 7.94% return, which is significantly lower than PRUIX's 11.53% return.


TBLGX

1D
0.08%
1M
2.74%
YTD
7.94%
6M
8.88%
1Y
19.51%
3Y*
14.65%
5Y*
10Y*

PRUIX

1D
0.27%
1M
5.24%
YTD
11.53%
6M
11.90%
1Y
29.51%
3Y*
22.64%
5Y*
14.12%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBLGX vs. PRUIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TBLGX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2030 Fund
7.94%15.49%11.32%16.91%-16.41%2.96%
PRUIX
T. Rowe Price Equity Index 500 Fund - I Class
11.53%17.82%24.95%26.24%-18.14%9.05%

Correlation

The correlation between TBLGX and PRUIX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2021

0.93

The correlation between TBLGX and PRUIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBLGX vs. PRUIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBLGX
TBLGX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
TBLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
TBLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

PRUIX
PRUIX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PRUIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRUIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRUIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
PRUIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRUIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBLGX vs. PRUIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2030 Fund (TBLGX) and T. Rowe Price Equity Index 500 Fund - I Class (PRUIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TBLGXPRUIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.41

2.55

-0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.43

3.45

-0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.46

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

3.37

-0.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.37

15.79

-2.42

TBLGX vs. PRUIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBLGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the PRUIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBLGX and PRUIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBLGXPRUIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

2.55

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.86

-0.23

Drawdowns

TBLGX vs. PRUIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBLGX drawdown since its inception was -23.25%, smaller than the maximum PRUIX drawdown of -33.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLGX and PRUIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBLGXPRUIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.25%

-33.80%

+10.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.69%

-8.91%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.81%

-18.76%

+7.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.85%

-4.23%

-1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.49%

1.90%

-0.41%

Volatility

TBLGX vs. PRUIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2030 Fund (TBLGX) is 2.59%, while T. Rowe Price Equity Index 500 Fund - I Class (PRUIX) has a volatility of 2.82%. This indicates that TBLGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRUIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBLGXPRUIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

2.82%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.68%

8.98%

-2.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.33%

11.88%

-3.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.39%

16.99%

-5.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.39%

18.10%

-6.71%

TBLGX vs. PRUIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBLGX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than PRUIX's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TBLGX vs. PRUIX - Dividend Comparison

TBLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, more than PRUIX's 2.22% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PRUIX
T. Rowe Price Equity Index 500 Fund - I Class
2.22%2.44%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.64%2.09%2.25%2.77%1.39%2.16%
TBLGX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2030 Fund
2.66%2.87%2.48%2.21%2.60%1.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, TBLGX and PRUIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PRUIX has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to TBLGX (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLGX dropped -23.25% vs PRUIX's -33.80%.

PRUIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBLGX and PRUIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer