PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCQTX vs. VTTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCQTX vs. VTTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund (FCQTX) and Vanguard Target Retirement 2060 Fund (VTTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FCQTX having a 11.20% return and VTTSX slightly higher at 11.59%.


FCQTX

1D
1.17%
1M
2.47%
YTD
11.20%
6M
11.13%
1Y
26.11%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
10.31%
10Y*

VTTSX

1D
1.13%
1M
1.70%
YTD
11.59%
6M
11.44%
1Y
27.66%
3Y*
18.39%
5Y*
10.43%
10Y*
11.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCQTX vs. VTTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FCQTX
American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund
11.20%20.74%15.64%21.56%-19.63%17.34%47.06%
VTTSX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2060 Fund
11.59%21.43%14.61%20.19%-17.48%16.45%42.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FCQTX and VTTSX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2020

0.98

The correlation between FCQTX and VTTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCQTX vs. VTTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCQTX
FCQTX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FCQTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCQTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCQTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FCQTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCQTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

VTTSX
VTTSX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VTTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VTTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCQTX vs. VTTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund (FCQTX) and Vanguard Target Retirement 2060 Fund (VTTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCQTXVTTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.41

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

3.05

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.68

13.23

-1.55

FCQTX vs. VTTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCQTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the VTTSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCQTX and VTTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCQTX vs. VTTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCQTX drawdown since its inception was -27.34%, smaller than the maximum VTTSX drawdown of -31.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCQTX and VTTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCQTXVTTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.34%

-31.38%

+4.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.83%

-8.93%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.53%

-14.51%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.34%

-25.40%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-0.51%

+0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.85%

-4.03%

-1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

2.06%

+0.15%

Volatility

FCQTX vs. VTTSX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund (FCQTX) has a higher volatility of 5.24% compared to Vanguard Target Retirement 2060 Fund (VTTSX) at 4.88%. This indicates that FCQTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCQTXVTTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

4.88%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.65%

10.03%

+0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.85%

12.12%

+0.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.86%

14.30%

+0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.12%

15.15%

-0.03%

FCQTX vs. VTTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCQTX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than VTTSX's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FCQTX vs. VTTSX - Dividend Comparison

FCQTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, more than VTTSX's 1.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCQTX
American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund
4.20%4.67%2.80%1.99%3.96%1.54%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTTSX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2060 Fund
1.84%2.06%2.20%2.14%2.09%5.67%1.83%2.11%2.33%1.77%1.98%1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FCQTX and VTTSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCQTX has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to VTTSX (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCQTX dropped -27.34% vs VTTSX's -31.38%.

VTTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCQTX and VTTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer