TAXT vs. ITM
TAXT (Northern Trust Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) and ITM (VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - TAXT tracks the ICE Focused Municipal Bond Index while ITM tracks the Bloomberg AMT-Free Intermediate Continuous. Both are passively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TAXT charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for ITM.
Performance
TAXT vs. ITM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAXT achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly higher than ITM's 0.28% return.
TAXT
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITM
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- 6M
- -0.30%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 1Y
- 6.05%
- 3Y*
- 3.22%
- 5Y*
- 0.21%
- 10Y*
- 1.79%
TAXT vs. ITM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TAXT Northern Trust Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 1.29% | 3.91% |
ITM VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF | 0.28% | 4.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAXT and ITM is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAXT vs. ITM — Risk / Return Rank
TAXT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ITM
TAXT vs. ITM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXT) and VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF (ITM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TAXT | ITM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.45 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.77 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.26 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TAXT vs. ITM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAXT drawdown since its inception was -2.49%, smaller than the maximum ITM drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAXT and ITM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAXT | ITM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.49% | -24.75% | +22.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -1.65% | +0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.47% | -2.97% | +2.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.15% | — |
Volatility
TAXT vs. ITM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAXT | ITM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.22% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49% | 2.83% | -0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.49% | 4.31% | -1.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.49% | 7.09% | -4.60% |
TAXT vs. ITM - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAXT has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than ITM's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TAXT vs. ITM - Dividend Comparison
TAXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than ITM's 2.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITM VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF | 2.98% | 2.86% | 2.73% | 2.40% | 1.92% | 1.70% | 2.13% | 2.44% | 2.33% | 2.21% | 2.29% | 2.28% |
TAXT Northern Trust Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 2.83% | 1.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TAXT and ITM have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TAXT is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TAXT is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for ITM.
ITM has the higher dividend yield at 2.98%, compared with 2.83% for TAXT.
TAXT tracks ICE Focused Municipal Bond Index, while ITM tracks Bloomberg AMT-Free Intermediate Continuous. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for TAXT and 0.24% for ITM.
Find the right allocation for TAXT and ITM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer