PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TATYY vs. UL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TATYY vs. UL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tate & Lyle PLC ADR (TATYY) and Unilever PLC (UL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TATYY achieves a 50.19% return, which is significantly higher than UL's -1.37% return. Over the past 10 years, TATYY has underperformed UL with an annualized return of 2.55%, while UL has yielded a comparatively higher 5.32% annualized return.


TATYY

1D
0.00%
1M
0.21%
6M
44.68%
YTD
50.19%
1Y
7.76%
3Y*
-4.75%
5Y*
-0.40%
10Y*
2.55%
ALL TIME*
3.83%

UL

1D
-2.85%
1M
1.49%
6M
-5.64%
YTD
-1.37%
1Y
-3.63%
3Y*
5.24%
5Y*
3.14%
10Y*
5.32%
ALL TIME*
9.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$6.37K$16.58K$46.42K
$387.98M$308.85M$260.04M

TATYY vs. UL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TATYY
Tate & Lyle PLC ADR
50.19%-35.21%-0.61%-0.36%18.05%-0.65%-1.93%19.27%-4.33%9.74%
UL
Unilever PLC
-1.37%5.96%20.90%-0.17%-2.82%-7.61%9.04%12.88%-2.34%40.15%

Correlation

The correlation between TATYY and UL is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.18

The correlation between TATYY and UL shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TATYY:

$7.03B

UL:

$136.60B

EPS

TATYY:

£2.15

UL:

€5.38

PE Ratio

TATYY:

10.23

UL:

10.22

PS Ratio

TATYY:

0.70

UL:

1.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

TATYY:

£3.54B

UL:

€111.11B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TATYY:

£722.00M

UL:

€111.26B

EBITDA (TTM)

TATYY:

£597.20M

UL:

€24.12B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TATYY vs. UL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TATYY
TATYY Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
TATYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TATYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
TATYY Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
TATYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
TATYY Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

UL
UL Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
UL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
UL Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
UL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
UL Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TATYY vs. UL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tate & Lyle PLC ADR (TATYY) and Unilever PLC (UL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TATYYULDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.02

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.19

-0.01

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.30

-0.02

+0.32

TATYY vs. UL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TATYY Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is higher than the UL Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TATYY and UL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TATYY vs. UL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TATYY drawdown since its inception was -57.06%, which is greater than UL's maximum drawdown of -53.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TATYY and UL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TATYYULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.06%

-53.55%

-3.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.33%

-25.09%

-15.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.06%

-25.09%

-31.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.06%

-25.09%

-31.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.06%

-30.13%

-26.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.03%

-13.52%

-12.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.71%

-10.63%

-5.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.03%

13.47%

+12.56%

Volatility

TATYY vs. UL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tate & Lyle PLC ADR (TATYY) is 1.97%, while Unilever PLC (UL) has a volatility of 11.44%. This indicates that TATYY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TATYYULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.97%

11.44%

-9.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.15%

19.70%

+24.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.28%

24.32%

+31.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.87%

21.32%

+16.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.88%

21.76%

+12.12%

Dividends

TATYY vs. UL - Dividend Comparison

TATYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, less than UL's 3.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TATYY
Tate & Lyle PLC ADR
3.56%5.27%3.03%2.90%19.44%4.72%3.74%3.67%4.18%3.64%3.81%0.00%
UL
Unilever PLC
3.60%3.51%3.29%3.83%3.57%3.77%3.07%3.18%3.49%2.80%3.42%3.02%

Financials

TATYY vs. UL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tate & Lyle PLC ADR and Unilever PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TATYY and UL have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UL has higher volatility (11.44%) compared to TATYY (1.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TATYY dropped -57.06% vs UL's -53.55%.

TATYY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.14 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TATYY and UL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer