TATYY vs. ADM
Compare and contrast key facts about Tate & Lyle PLC ADR (TATYY) and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM).
Performance
TATYY vs. ADM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TATYY vs. ADM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TATYY Tate & Lyle PLC ADR | -3.88% | -35.21% | -0.61% | -0.36% | 18.05% | -0.65% | -1.93% | 19.27% | -4.33% | 9.74% |
ADM Archer-Daniels-Midland Company | 27.39% | 18.24% | -27.52% | -20.42% | 39.98% | 37.33% | 12.44% | 17.10% | 5.28% | -9.48% |
Fundamentals
TATYY:
$2.17B
ADM:
$35.18B
TATYY:
$2.67
ADM:
$2.23
TATYY:
7.28
ADM:
32.64
TATYY:
0.56
ADM:
0.44
TATYY:
$3.90B
ADM:
$80.29B
TATYY:
$1.50B
ADM:
$5.03B
TATYY:
$656.31M
ADM:
$2.41B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TATYY achieves a -3.88% return, which is significantly lower than ADM's 27.39% return. Over the past 10 years, TATYY has underperformed ADM with an annualized return of 0.14%, while ADM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.37% annualized return.
TATYY
- 1D
- 5.16%
- 1M
- -4.73%
- YTD
- -3.88%
- 6M
- -19.78%
- 1Y
- -24.95%
- 3Y*
- -17.89%
- 5Y*
- -8.86%
- 10Y*
- 0.14%
ADM
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 5.29%
- YTD
- 27.39%
- 6M
- 23.63%
- 1Y
- 56.75%
- 3Y*
- 0.24%
- 5Y*
- 7.72%
- 10Y*
- 10.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TATYY vs. ADM — Risk / Return Rank
TATYY
ADM
TATYY vs. ADM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tate & Lyle PLC ADR (TATYY) and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TATYY | ADM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | 2.01 | -2.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | 2.68 | -3.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.35 | -0.46 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 4.30 | -4.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.96 | 12.30 | -13.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TATYY | ADM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.69 | 2.01 | -2.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.28 | 0.28 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.00 | 0.39 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.02 | 0.25 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between TATYY and ADM is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
TATYY vs. ADM - Dividend Comparison
TATYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, more than ADM's 2.82% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TATYY Tate & Lyle PLC ADR | 5.48% | 5.27% | 3.03% | 2.90% | 19.44% | 4.72% | 3.74% | 3.67% | 4.18% | 3.64% | 3.81% | 0.00% |
ADM Archer-Daniels-Midland Company | 2.82% | 3.55% | 3.96% | 2.49% | 1.72% | 2.19% | 2.86% | 3.02% | 3.27% | 3.19% | 2.63% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
TATYY vs. ADM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TATYY drawdown since its inception was -57.06%, smaller than the maximum ADM drawdown of -68.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TATYY and ADM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TATYY | ADM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.06% | -68.01% | +10.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.07% | -13.32% | -30.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.06% | -54.14% | -2.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.06% | -54.14% | -2.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.66% | -17.41% | -35.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.03% | -21.63% | +6.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.72% | 4.65% | +22.07% |
Volatility
TATYY vs. ADM - Volatility Comparison
Tate & Lyle PLC ADR (TATYY) has a higher volatility of 12.96% compared to Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) at 9.85%. This indicates that TATYY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ADM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TATYY | ADM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.96% | 9.85% | +3.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.12% | 19.51% | +7.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.52% | 28.31% | +8.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.98% | 27.92% | +4.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.86% | 26.91% | +3.95% |
Financials
TATYY vs. ADM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tate & Lyle PLC ADR and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TATYY vs. ADM - Profitability Comparison
TATYY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tate & Lyle PLC ADR reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ADM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported a gross profit of 1.59B and revenue of 18.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.6%.
TATYY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tate & Lyle PLC ADR reported an operating income of 131.52M and revenue of 1.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.6%.
ADM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported an operating income of 679.00M and revenue of 18.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.
TATYY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tate & Lyle PLC ADR reported a net income of 75.16M and revenue of 1.37B, resulting in a net margin of 5.5%.
ADM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported a net income of 456.00M and revenue of 18.56B, resulting in a net margin of 2.5%.