PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TATYY vs. RIO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TATYY vs. RIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tate & Lyle PLC ADR (TATYY) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TATYY achieves a 33.17% return, which is significantly lower than RIO's 38.54% return. Over the past 10 years, TATYY has underperformed RIO with an annualized return of 2.20%, while RIO has yielded a comparatively higher 22.38% annualized return.


TATYY

1D
0.97%
1M
33.30%
YTD
33.17%
6M
38.15%
1Y
-6.81%
3Y*
-8.77%
5Y*
-3.37%
10Y*
2.20%

RIO

1D
-3.41%
1M
9.36%
YTD
38.54%
6M
49.27%
1Y
92.97%
3Y*
27.11%
5Y*
11.69%
10Y*
22.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TATYY vs. RIO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TATYY
Tate & Lyle PLC ADR
33.17%-35.21%-0.61%-0.36%18.05%-0.65%-1.93%19.27%-4.33%9.74%
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
38.54%44.47%-15.36%11.06%18.48%-3.67%36.22%33.18%-2.93%44.87%

Correlation

The correlation between TATYY and RIO is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.13

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TATYY:

$3.02B

RIO:

$176.72B

EPS

TATYY:

$2.15

RIO:

$13.11

PE Ratio

TATYY:

12.53

RIO:

8.23

PS Ratio

TATYY:

0.85

RIO:

1.59

PB Ratio

TATYY:

1.89

RIO:

2.84

Total Revenue (TTM)

TATYY:

$3.54B

RIO:

$111.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TATYY:

$722.00M

RIO:

$31.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

TATYY:

$597.20M

RIO:

$40.42B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TATYY vs. RIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TATYY
TATYY Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
TATYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TATYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
TATYY Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
TATYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
TATYY Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

RIO
RIO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
RIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
RIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TATYY vs. RIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tate & Lyle PLC ADR (TATYY) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TATYYRIODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.12

3.29

-3.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.24

3.81

-3.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.50

-0.47

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

6.16

-6.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.26

24.21

-24.48

TATYY vs. RIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TATYY Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the RIO Sharpe Ratio of 3.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TATYY and RIO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TATYYRIODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

3.29

-3.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

0.40

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

0.73

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.34

-0.26

Drawdowns

TATYY vs. RIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TATYY drawdown since its inception was -57.06%, smaller than the maximum RIO drawdown of -88.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TATYY and RIO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TATYYRIODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.06%

-88.97%

+31.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.33%

-15.19%

-25.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.06%

-24.19%

-32.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.06%

-35.25%

-21.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.06%

-37.47%

-19.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.42%

-3.73%

-30.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.55%

-23.78%

+8.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.04%

3.85%

+22.19%

Volatility

TATYY vs. RIO - Volatility Comparison

Tate & Lyle PLC ADR (TATYY) has a higher volatility of 37.59% compared to Rio Tinto Group (RIO) at 11.49%. This indicates that TATYY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TATYYRIODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

37.59%

11.49%

+26.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.04%

23.38%

+19.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.80%

28.44%

+27.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.69%

29.16%

+8.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.91%

30.66%

+3.25%

Dividends

TATYY vs. RIO - Dividend Comparison

TATYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, more than RIO's 3.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
3.73%4.66%7.40%5.40%10.48%10.23%5.13%7.68%6.32%4.47%3.93%7.58%
TATYY
Tate & Lyle PLC ADR
3.96%5.27%3.03%2.90%19.44%4.72%3.74%3.67%4.18%3.64%3.81%0.00%

Financials

TATYY vs. RIO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tate & Lyle PLC ADR and Rio Tinto Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20222023202420252026
996.75M
30.65B
(TATYY) Total Revenue
(RIO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TATYY vs. RIO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Tate & Lyle PLC ADR and Rio Tinto Group over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
26.6%
Portfolio components
TATYY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tate & Lyle PLC ADR reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 996.75M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

RIO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a gross profit of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.6%.

TATYY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tate & Lyle PLC ADR reported an operating income of 83.23M and revenue of 996.75M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.4%.

RIO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported an operating income of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.

TATYY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tate & Lyle PLC ADR reported a net income of 41.62M and revenue of 996.75M, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.

RIO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a net income of 5.42B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TATYY and RIO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TATYY has higher volatility (37.59%) compared to RIO (11.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TATYY dropped -57.06% vs RIO's -88.97%.

RIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TATYY and RIO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer