PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TATYY vs. BA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TATYY vs. BA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tate & Lyle PLC ADR (TATYY) and BAE Systems plc (BA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TATYY is traded in USD, while BA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TATYY achieves a 33.17% return, which is significantly higher than BA.L's 10.60% return. Over the past 10 years, TATYY has underperformed BA.L with an annualized return of 2.20%, while BA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 17.37% annualized return.


TATYY

1D
0.97%
1M
33.30%
YTD
33.17%
6M
38.15%
1Y
-6.81%
3Y*
-8.77%
5Y*
-3.37%
10Y*
2.20%

BA.L

1D
-0.71%
1M
-7.59%
YTD
10.60%
6M
16.24%
1Y
-2.85%
3Y*
31.88%
5Y*
30.70%
10Y*
17.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TATYY vs. BA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TATYY
Tate & Lyle PLC ADR
33.17%-35.21%-0.61%-0.36%18.05%-0.65%-1.93%19.27%-4.33%9.74%
BA.L
BAE Systems plc
10.60%63.60%4.12%40.34%43.72%16.51%-6.51%33.58%-21.46%9.84%

Correlation

The correlation between TATYY and BA.L is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.14

The correlation between TATYY and BA.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.14 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TATYY:

$3.02B

BA.L:

£57.64B

EPS

TATYY:

$2.15

BA.L:

£1.33

PE Ratio

TATYY:

12.53

BA.L:

14.33

PS Ratio

TATYY:

0.85

BA.L:

1.05

PB Ratio

TATYY:

1.89

BA.L:

4.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

TATYY:

$3.54B

BA.L:

£54.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TATYY:

$722.00M

BA.L:

£4.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

TATYY:

$597.20M

BA.L:

£7.55B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TATYY vs. BA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TATYY
TATYY Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
TATYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TATYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
TATYY Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
TATYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
TATYY Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

BA.L
BA.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
BA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
BA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
BA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
BA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TATYY vs. BA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tate & Lyle PLC ADR (TATYY) and BAE Systems plc (BA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TATYYBA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.01

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

-0.13

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.26

-0.28

+0.02

TATYY vs. BA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TATYY Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the BA.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TATYY and BA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TATYYBA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

-0.09

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

1.13

-1.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

0.65

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.38

-0.30

Drawdowns

TATYY vs. BA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TATYY drawdown since its inception was -57.06%, roughly equal to the maximum BA.L drawdown of -57.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TATYY and BA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TATYYBA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.06%

-57.18%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.33%

-22.64%

-17.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.06%

-22.64%

-34.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.06%

-22.64%

-34.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.06%

-41.57%

-15.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.42%

-18.06%

-16.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.55%

-18.51%

+2.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.04%

10.24%

+15.80%

Volatility

TATYY vs. BA.L - Volatility Comparison

Tate & Lyle PLC ADR (TATYY) has a higher volatility of 37.59% compared to BAE Systems plc (BA.L) at 10.46%. This indicates that TATYY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TATYYBA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

37.59%

10.46%

+27.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.04%

24.58%

+18.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.80%

31.12%

+24.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.69%

27.06%

+10.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.91%

26.85%

+7.06%

Dividends

TATYY vs. BA.L - Dividend Comparison

TATYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, more than BA.L's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BA.L
BAE Systems plc
0.72%1.99%2.69%2.53%2.99%4.40%4.75%4.00%4.79%3.75%3.57%4.14%
TATYY
Tate & Lyle PLC ADR
3.96%5.27%3.03%2.90%19.44%4.72%3.74%3.67%4.18%3.64%3.81%0.00%

Financials

TATYY vs. BA.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tate & Lyle PLC ADR and BAE Systems plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
996.75M
14.77B
(TATYY) Total Revenue
(BA.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. TATYY values in USD, BA.L values in GBp

TATYY vs. BA.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Tate & Lyle PLC ADR and BAE Systems plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
9.2%
Portfolio components
TATYY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tate & Lyle PLC ADR reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 996.75M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

BA.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems plc reported a gross profit of 1.35B and revenue of 14.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.2%.

TATYY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tate & Lyle PLC ADR reported an operating income of 83.23M and revenue of 996.75M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.4%.

BA.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems plc reported an operating income of 1.35B and revenue of 14.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.

TATYY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tate & Lyle PLC ADR reported a net income of 41.62M and revenue of 996.75M, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.

BA.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems plc reported a net income of 1.09B and revenue of 14.77B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TATYY and BA.L have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TATYY and BA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer