TARK vs. QTJL

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

TARK (Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TARK returned 4.42%/yr vs 16.01%/yr for QTJL. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TARK charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.

Performance

TARK vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TARK achieves a -14.60% return, which is significantly lower than QTJL's 3.14% return.

TARK

• 1D: -3.17%
• 1M: -8.62%
• 6M: -23.54%
• YTD: -14.60%
• 1Y: -20.30%
• 3Y*: 4.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTJL

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: -3.77%
• 6M: 2.43%
• YTD: 3.14%
• 1Y: 11.81%
• 3Y*: 16.01%
• 5Y*: 9.52%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TARK vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
TARK Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF	-14.60%	41.00%	-4.85%	121.37%	-71.31%
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	3.14%	21.07%	16.50%	42.39%	-13.13%

Correlation

The correlation between TARK and QTJL is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2022	0.72

The correlation between TARK and QTJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TARK vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TARK

TARK Risk / Return Rank: 8
TARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
TARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
TARK Omega Ratio Rank: 9
TARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
TARK Martin Ratio Rank: 7

QTJL

QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 45
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 43
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TARK vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TARK	QTJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.28	1.11	-1.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.06	1.60	-1.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.22	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.35	1.77	-2.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.63	8.67	-9.30

TARK vs. QTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TARK Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the QTJL Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TARK and QTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TARK vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TARK drawdown since its inception was -77.82%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TARK and QTJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	TARK	QTJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.82%	-33.40%	-44.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.57%	-6.68%	-50.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-65.55%	-22.43%	-43.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.81%	-4.09%	-39.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.58%	-7.77%	-42.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.20%	1.37%	+30.83%

Volatility

TARK vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) has a higher volatility of 18.42% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) at 4.26%. This indicates that TARK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TARK	QTJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.42%	4.26%	+14.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.15%	8.46%	+45.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	71.69%	10.68%	+61.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	90.28%	20.34%	+69.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	90.28%	20.26%	+70.02%

TARK vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TARK has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

TARK vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison

TARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.12%, while QTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TARK Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF	35.12%	30.00%	0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TARK and QTJL in my portfolio?

TARK and QTJL have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TARK or QTJL?

TARK has higher volatility (18.42%) compared to QTJL (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TARK dropped -77.82% vs QTJL's -33.40%.

Which ETF is better, TARK or QTJL?

On 3-year performance, QTJL leads with 16.01% vs 4.42% for TARK. On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 4.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TARK or QTJL?

Over the 3-year period, QTJL has performed better with a 16.01% return vs 4.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TARK or QTJL?

QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TARK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TARK or QTJL?

TARK has the higher dividend yield at 35.12%, compared with 0.00% for QTJL.

What is the main difference between TARK and QTJL?

They also come from different issuers: AXS and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TARK and 0.79% for QTJL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.