TALO vs. CB
TALO (Talos Energy Inc.) and CB (Chubb Limited) are both stocks. TALO operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while CB operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, TALO returned -4.36%/yr vs 17.28%/yr for CB. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TALO vs. CB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TALO achieves a 26.68% return, which is significantly higher than CB's 7.05% return.
TALO
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -12.97%
- YTD
- 26.68%
- 6M
- 24.98%
- 1Y
- 57.92%
- 3Y*
- 1.53%
- 5Y*
- -4.36%
- 10Y*
- —
CB
- 1D
- 2.12%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 7.05%
- 6M
- 6.65%
- 1Y
- 16.71%
- 3Y*
- 21.40%
- 5Y*
- 17.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.44%
TALO vs. CB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TALO Talos Energy Inc. | 26.68% | 13.49% | -31.76% | -24.63% | 92.65% | 18.93% | -72.67% | 84.74% | -53.37% |
CB Chubb Limited | 7.05% | 14.46% | 23.89% | 4.20% | 15.97% | 27.85% | 1.41% | 22.94% | -2.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between TALO and CB is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2018 | 0.21 |
The correlation between TALO and CB shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TALO:
$2.35B
CB:
$131.05B
TALO:
-$4.28
CB:
$28.35
TALO:
1.39
CB:
2.76
TALO:
1.25
CB:
1.64
TALO:
$1.74B
CB:
$48.15B
TALO:
$40.64M
CB:
$17.01B
TALO:
$480.10M
CB:
$12.22B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TALO vs. CB — Risk / Return Rank
TALO
CB
TALO vs. CB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Talos Energy Inc. (TALO) and Chubb Limited (CB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TALO | CB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.18 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.14 | 1.79 | +1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.07 | 4.04 | +4.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TALO vs. CB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TALO drawdown since its inception was -86.34%, which is greater than CB's maximum drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TALO and CB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TALO | CB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.34% | -50.99% | -35.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.53% | -9.36% | -9.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.16% | -14.35% | -48.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.63% | -19.26% | -55.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.74% | -2.52% | -60.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.57% | -10.67% | -47.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.21% | 4.15% | +3.06% |
Volatility
TALO vs. CB - Volatility Comparison
Talos Energy Inc. (TALO) has a higher volatility of 15.41% compared to Chubb Limited (CB) at 6.13%. This indicates that TALO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TALO | CB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.41% | 6.13% | +9.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.07% | 12.88% | +25.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.28% | 17.78% | +31.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.93% | 20.24% | +35.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.32% | 23.67% | +40.65% |
Dividends
TALO vs. CB - Dividend Comparison
TALO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CB Chubb Limited | 1.18% | 1.22% | 1.30% | 1.51% | 1.49% | 1.65% | 2.01% | 1.91% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 2.07% | 4.23% |
TALO Talos Energy Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TALO vs. CB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Talos Energy Inc. and Chubb Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
TALO and CB have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TALO has higher volatility (15.41%) compared to CB (6.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TALO dropped -86.34% vs CB's -50.99%.
TALO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TALO and CB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer