TALO vs. FLR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TALO (Talos Energy Inc.) and FLR (Fluor Corporation) are both stocks. TALO operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while FLR operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, TALO returned -1.19%/yr vs 19.99%/yr for FLR. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

TALO vs. FLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Talos Energy Inc. (TALO) and Fluor Corporation (FLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TALO achieves a 37.75% return, which is significantly higher than FLR's 26.57% return.

TALO

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: -6.30%
• YTD: 37.75%
• 6M: 28.86%
• 1Y: 80.29%
• 3Y*: 3.43%
• 5Y*: -1.19%
• 10Y*: —

FLR

• 1D: 1.66%
• 1M: -4.44%
• YTD: 26.57%
• 6M: 13.87%
• 1Y: 15.60%
• 3Y*: 19.32%
• 5Y*: 19.99%
• 10Y*: 0.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TALO vs. FLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
TALO Talos Energy Inc.	37.75%	13.49%	-31.76%	-24.63%	92.65%	18.93%	-72.67%	84.74%	-55.10%
FLR Fluor Corporation	26.57%	-19.65%	25.91%	13.01%	39.93%	55.10%	-14.55%	-39.54%	-29.63%

Correlation

The correlation between TALO and FLR is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2018	0.39

The correlation between TALO and FLR shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS TALO : -$4.28 FLR : $2.65
PS Ratio TALO : 1.51 FLR : 0.44
Total Revenue (TTM) TALO : $1.74B FLR : $15.19B
Gross Profit (TTM) TALO : $40.64M FLR : -$247.00M
EBITDA (TTM) TALO : $480.10M FLR : -$276.00M

Return for Risk

TALO vs. FLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TALO

TALO Risk / Return Rank: 83
TALO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
TALO Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
TALO Omega Ratio Rank: 75
TALO Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
TALO Martin Ratio Rank: 88

FLR

FLR Risk / Return Rank: 50
FLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
FLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
FLR Omega Ratio Rank: 50
FLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
FLR Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TALO vs. FLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Talos Energy Inc. (TALO) and Fluor Corporation (FLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TALO	FLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	0.30	+1.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	0.72	+1.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.11	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.36	0.52	+3.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.94	0.81	+10.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TALO vs. FLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TALO Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the FLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TALO and FLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TALO	FLR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.66	0.30	+1.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.02	0.45	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.01	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.16	0.13	-0.29

Drawdowns

TALO vs. FLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TALO drawdown since its inception was -86.34%, smaller than the maximum FLR drawdown of -95.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TALO and FLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	TALO	FLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.34%	-95.89%	+9.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.53%	-30.19%	+11.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-63.16%	-47.63%	-15.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-74.63%	-47.63%	-27.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-94.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-59.49%	-39.31%	-20.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.58%	-41.62%	-16.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.38%	19.39%	-12.01%

Volatility

TALO vs. FLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Talos Energy Inc. (TALO) is 13.56%, while Fluor Corporation (FLR) has a volatility of 21.06%. This indicates that TALO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TALO	FLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.56%	21.06%	-7.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.55%	33.64%	+3.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	48.93%	52.05%	-3.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.94%	45.08%	+10.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	64.39%	57.62%	+6.77%

Dividends

TALO vs. FLR - Dividend Comparison

Neither TALO nor FLR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLR Fluor Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.63%	3.87%	2.61%	1.63%	1.60%	1.78%
TALO Talos Energy Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

TALO vs. FLR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Talos Energy Inc. and Fluor Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

TALO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Talos Energy Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 472.31M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

FLR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fluor Corporation reported a gross profit of 13.00M and revenue of 3.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.4%.

TALO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Talos Energy Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 472.31M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

FLR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fluor Corporation reported an operating income of 92.00M and revenue of 3.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.5%.

TALO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Talos Energy Inc. reported a net income of -256.17M and revenue of 472.31M, resulting in a net margin of -54.2%.

FLR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fluor Corporation reported a net income of 160.00M and revenue of 3.66B, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TALO and FLR in my portfolio?

TALO and FLR have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TALO or FLR?

FLR has higher volatility (21.06%) compared to TALO (13.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TALO dropped -86.34% vs FLR's -95.89%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TALO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.