PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAGS vs. XBNB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAGS vs. XBNB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) and Teucrium xETFs 2x Long Daily BNB ETF (XBNB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TAGS

1D
-1.10%
1M
5.02%
6M
11.02%
YTD
9.27%
1Y
3.55%
3Y*
-6.91%
5Y*
-0.49%
10Y*
-1.04%

XBNB

1D
-1.47%
1M
-12.87%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAGS vs. XBNB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TAGS and XBNB is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2026

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAGS vs. XBNB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAGS
TAGS Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
TAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
TAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

XBNB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAGS vs. XBNB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) and Teucrium xETFs 2x Long Daily BNB ETF (XBNB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TAGSXBNBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.75

TAGS vs. XBNB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TAGS vs. XBNB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAGS drawdown since its inception was -76.40%, which is greater than XBNB's maximum drawdown of -40.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAGS and XBNB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAGSXBNBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.40%

-40.97%

-35.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.61%

-35.63%

-26.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.26%

-19.92%

-37.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.74%

Volatility

TAGS vs. XBNB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAGSXBNBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.86%

85.86%

-73.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.11%

85.86%

-69.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.00%

85.86%

-67.86%

TAGS vs. XBNB - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAGS has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than XBNB's 1.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

TAGS vs. XBNB - Dividend Comparison

TAGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XBNB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TAGS and XBNB have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TAGS is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TAGS is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 1.89% for XBNB.

XBNB has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for TAGS.

TAGS is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while XBNB is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. TAGS tracks Teucrium TAGS Index, while XBNB tracks Binance Coin (BNB). Their fees differ too: 0.21% for TAGS and 1.89% for XBNB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAGS and XBNB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer