TAGS vs. XBNB
TAGS (Teucrium Agricultural Fund) and XBNB (Teucrium xETFs 2x Long Daily BNB ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TAGS is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium TAGS Index, while XBNB is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Binance Coin (BNB). Both are passively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TAGS charges 0.21%/yr vs 1.89%/yr for XBNB.
Performance
TAGS vs. XBNB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TAGS
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- 5.02%
- 6M
- 11.02%
- YTD
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 3.55%
- 3Y*
- -6.91%
- 5Y*
- -0.49%
- 10Y*
- -1.04%
XBNB
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- -12.87%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TAGS vs. XBNB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 1.35% |
XBNB Teucrium xETFs 2x Long Daily BNB ETF | -22.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAGS and XBNB is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2026 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAGS vs. XBNB — Risk / Return Rank
TAGS
XBNB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TAGS vs. XBNB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) and Teucrium xETFs 2x Long Daily BNB ETF (XBNB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TAGS | XBNB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.75 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TAGS vs. XBNB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAGS drawdown since its inception was -76.40%, which is greater than XBNB's maximum drawdown of -40.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAGS and XBNB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAGS | XBNB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.40% | -40.97% | -35.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.61% | -35.63% | -26.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.26% | -19.92% | -37.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.74% | — | — |
Volatility
TAGS vs. XBNB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAGS | XBNB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.73% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.86% | 85.86% | -73.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.11% | 85.86% | -69.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 85.86% | -67.86% |
TAGS vs. XBNB - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAGS has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than XBNB's 1.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
TAGS vs. XBNB - Dividend Comparison
TAGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XBNB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 0.00% |
XBNB Teucrium xETFs 2x Long Daily BNB ETF | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TAGS and XBNB have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TAGS is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TAGS is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 1.89% for XBNB.
XBNB has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for TAGS.
TAGS is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while XBNB is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. TAGS tracks Teucrium TAGS Index, while XBNB tracks Binance Coin (BNB). Their fees differ too: 0.21% for TAGS and 1.89% for XBNB.
Find the right allocation for TAGS and XBNB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer