TAGS vs. KROP
Compare and contrast key facts about Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP).
TAGS and KROP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TAGS is a passively managed fund by Teucrium that tracks the performance of the Teucrium TAGS Index. It was launched on Mar 28, 2012. KROP is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. It was launched on Jul 12, 2021. Both TAGS and KROP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
TAGS vs. KROP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TAGS vs. KROP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 8.51% | -8.76% | -14.57% | -6.11% | 16.25% | 6.27% |
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF | 15.06% | 7.95% | -8.74% | -23.86% | -27.23% | -18.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAGS achieves a 8.51% return, which is significantly lower than KROP's 15.06% return.
TAGS
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 8.51%
- 6M
- 6.56%
- 1Y
- -3.00%
- 3Y*
- -7.12%
- 5Y*
- 2.24%
- 10Y*
- -0.63%
KROP
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -4.77%
- YTD
- 15.06%
- 6M
- 15.34%
- 1Y
- 18.33%
- 3Y*
- -5.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TAGS vs. KROP - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAGS has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than KROP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TAGS vs. KROP — Risk / Return Rank
TAGS
KROP
TAGS vs. KROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TAGS | KROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | 0.96 | -1.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | 1.41 | -1.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.19 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | 1.78 | -1.90 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.19 | 4.21 | -4.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TAGS | KROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 | 0.96 | -1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.22 | -0.60 | +0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between TAGS and KROP is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
TAGS vs. KROP - Dividend Comparison
TAGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KROP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF | 2.37% | 2.73% | 1.89% | 1.36% | 0.71% | 0.69% |
Drawdowns
TAGS vs. KROP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAGS drawdown since its inception was -76.40%, which is greater than KROP's maximum drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAGS and KROP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAGS | KROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.40% | -61.96% | -14.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.12% | -11.29% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.87% | -49.60% | -13.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.16% | -44.32% | -12.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.59% | 4.78% | +2.81% |
Volatility
TAGS vs. KROP - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) have volatilities of 5.30% and 5.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TAGS | KROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.30% | 5.19% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.70% | 12.34% | -3.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.64% | 19.33% | -7.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 22.43% | -5.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.35% | 22.43% | -4.08% |