TAGS vs. GLCR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TAGS (Teucrium Agricultural Fund) and GLCR (GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TAGS is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium TAGS Index, while GLCR is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Iceland Global Total Return Net Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TAGS returned -0.95% vs -7.32% for GLCR. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. TAGS charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for GLCR.

Performance

TAGS vs. GLCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) and GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF (GLCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAGS achieves a 6.11% return, which is significantly higher than GLCR's -10.49% return.

TAGS

• 1D: -1.20%
• 1M: -5.48%
• YTD: 6.11%
• 6M: 4.04%
• 1Y: -0.95%
• 3Y*: -7.08%
• 5Y*: -1.51%
• 10Y*: -1.74%

GLCR

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: -9.07%
• YTD: -10.49%
• 6M: -3.88%
• 1Y: -7.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAGS vs. GLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund	6.11%	-9.39%
GLCR GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF	-10.49%	8.04%

Correlation

The correlation between TAGS and GLCR is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025	-0.01

TAGS vs. GLCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TAGS	GLCR
Financial Services	99.9%	32.2%
Basic Materials	-	5.6%
Communication Services	-	1.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	5.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	21.2%
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	20.2%
Industrials	-	6.0%
Real Estate	-	7.6%
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

TAGS vs. GLCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAGS

TAGS Risk / Return Rank: 8
TAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
TAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
TAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 7
TAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
TAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 8

GLCR

GLCR Risk / Return Rank: 5
GLCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
GLCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
GLCR Omega Ratio Rank: 5
GLCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
GLCR Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAGS vs. GLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) and GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF (GLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TAGS	GLCR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.08	-0.45	+0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.02	-0.50	+0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	0.94	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.09	-0.44	+0.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.16	-1.22	+1.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TAGS vs. GLCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAGS Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is higher than the GLCR Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAGS and GLCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TAGS	GLCR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08	-0.45	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.09	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.23	-0.15	-0.08

Drawdowns

TAGS vs. GLCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAGS drawdown since its inception was -76.40%, which is greater than GLCR's maximum drawdown of -16.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAGS and GLCR.

Drawdown Indicators

	TAGS	GLCR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.40%	-16.79%	-59.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.07%	-16.79%	+6.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.59%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.60%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-63.69%	-16.79%	-46.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-57.23%	-4.54%	-52.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.88%	6.02%	-0.14%

Volatility

TAGS vs. GLCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) is 5.52%, while GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF (GLCR) has a volatility of 7.93%. This indicates that TAGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TAGS	GLCR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.52%	7.93%	-2.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.12%	13.27%	-3.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.61%	16.40%	-3.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.58%	18.62%	-2.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.04%	18.62%	-0.58%

TAGS vs. GLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAGS has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than GLCR's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

TAGS vs. GLCR - Dividend Comparison

TAGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%.

Position	TTM	2025
GLCR GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF	1.08%	0.97%
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TAGS and GLCR in my portfolio?

TAGS and GLCR have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TAGS or GLCR?

GLCR has higher volatility (7.93%) compared to TAGS (5.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAGS dropped -76.40% vs GLCR's -16.79%.

Which ETF is better, TAGS or GLCR?

On 1-year performance, TAGS leads with -0.95% vs -7.32% for GLCR. On fees, TAGS is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, TAGS has been the lower-risk option at 5.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TAGS or GLCR?

Over the 1-year period, TAGS has performed better with a -0.95% return vs -7.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TAGS or GLCR?

TAGS is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for GLCR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TAGS or GLCR?

GLCR has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.00% for TAGS.

What is the main difference between TAGS and GLCR?

TAGS is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while GLCR is Europe Equities. TAGS tracks Teucrium TAGS Index, while GLCR tracks MarketVector Iceland Global Total Return Net Index. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for TAGS and 0.95% for GLCR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TAGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.08 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.