PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLCR vs. YFYA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLCR vs. YFYA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF (GLCR) and Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF (YFYA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLCR achieves a -10.49% return, which is significantly lower than YFYA's 2.34% return.


GLCR

1D
-0.67%
1M
-9.07%
YTD
-10.49%
6M
-3.88%
1Y
-7.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

YFYA

1D
0.41%
1M
1.07%
YTD
2.34%
6M
2.59%
1Y
5.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLCR vs. YFYA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GLCR and YFYA is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025

0.25

GLCR vs. YFYA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GLCR
YFYA

Financial Services

32.2%
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

21.2%
8.3%

Healthcare

20.2%
9.2%

Real Estate

7.6%
1.9%

Industrials

6.0%
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

5.8%
12.2%

Basic Materials

5.6%
1.4%

Communication Services

1.5%
11.1%

Energy

-

1.9%

Technology

-

36.9%

Utilities

-

3.7%

Financial Services

GLCR
32.2%
YFYA
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

GLCR
21.2%
YFYA
8.3%

Healthcare

GLCR
20.2%
YFYA
9.2%

Real Estate

GLCR
7.6%
YFYA
1.9%

Industrials

GLCR
6.0%
YFYA
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

GLCR
5.8%
YFYA
12.2%

Basic Materials

GLCR
5.6%
YFYA
1.4%

Communication Services

GLCR
1.5%
YFYA
11.1%

Energy

GLCR

-

YFYA
1.9%

Technology

GLCR

-

YFYA
36.9%

Utilities

GLCR

-

YFYA
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLCR vs. YFYA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLCR
GLCR Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
GLCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLCR Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
GLCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLCR Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

YFYA
YFYA Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
YFYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YFYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
YFYA Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
YFYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
YFYA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLCR vs. YFYA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF (GLCR) and Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF (YFYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLCRYFYADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.45

1.50

-1.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.50

2.21

-2.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.40

-0.46

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.44

3.35

-3.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.22

15.29

-16.51

GLCR vs. YFYA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLCR Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is lower than the YFYA Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLCR and YFYA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLCRYFYADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.45

1.50

-1.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.15

1.10

-1.25

Drawdowns

GLCR vs. YFYA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLCR drawdown since its inception was -16.79%, which is greater than YFYA's maximum drawdown of -2.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLCR and YFYA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLCRYFYADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.79%

-2.29%

-14.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.79%

-1.61%

-15.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.79%

0.00%

-16.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.54%

-0.33%

-4.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.02%

0.35%

+5.67%

Volatility

GLCR vs. YFYA - Volatility Comparison

GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF (GLCR) has a higher volatility of 7.93% compared to Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF (YFYA) at 1.14%. This indicates that GLCR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YFYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLCRYFYADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.93%

1.14%

+6.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.27%

3.35%

+9.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.40%

3.59%

+12.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.62%

3.59%

+15.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.62%

3.59%

+15.03%

GLCR vs. YFYA - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLCR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than YFYA's 1.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLCR vs. YFYA - Dividend Comparison

GLCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than YFYA's 5.14% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


GLCR and YFYA have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLCR has higher volatility (7.93%) compared to YFYA (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLCR dropped -16.79% vs YFYA's -2.29%.

On 1-year performance, YFYA leads with 5.38% vs -7.32% for GLCR. On fees, GLCR is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, YFYA has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, YFYA has performed better with a 5.38% return vs -7.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLCR is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.16% for YFYA.

YFYA has the higher dividend yield at 5.14%, compared with 1.08% for GLCR.

GLCR is categorized as Europe Equities, while YFYA is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for GLCR and 1.16% for YFYA.

YFYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLCR and YFYA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer